As events are developing in 2004, it becomes
more and more evident that the current events in Iraq and the election campaign
now raging in the United States are a repeat of events that took place some 50
years ago. The issues are the same, just new players with different names, but
with the same ideology as the players of the 1950’s. Dag Hammarskjold was a
powerful international player that stood in the way of the policies of Israel.
Since he could not be subdued and controlled, he was assassinated. The current
Secretary General of the United Nations is Kofi Atta Annan who was born
in Ghana, Africa in 1938. He is the seventh Secretary General of the United
Nations, one who is not bowing to the wishes of the Israeli leadership. The question
is, how long will he live on this earth?
Sergio Vieira de Mello
That this thought is not a far fetched idea can be seen in
the recent assassination of the United Nations’ diplomat Sergio Vieira de
Mello (born 1948 in Brazil). Sergio served in the United Nations for more
than 30 years and was appointed UN high commissioner of human rights in 2002. He
studied at the University of Paris (Sorbonne), France and received a degree in
philosophy in 1969 and a Ph.D. in 1974. Sergio served as a UN official in
Bangladesh, Cyprus, Mozambique, Lima, Peru, Lebanon, Bosnia and Herzegovina and
East Timor. His character was similar to Dag Hammarskjold and he had become a
very seasoned UN diplomat, knowing all the ins and outs of politics as being
played by world leaders, including international Jewish leaders. It was believed
at the United Nations that Sergio would become Secretary General of the UN once
Kofi Annan’s term was up. In 2003 Sergio became the director of the UN mission
to Iraq, and was stationed in Baghdad as the personal representative for Kofi
Annan. His orders were to stay in Iraq for four months and then return to his
regular assignment as high commissioner. At this time the UN had a total of 646
people working in Iraq, with 300 working in the UN headquarters in Baghdad. With
a strong UN force in place, Sergio was working hard to prepare Iraq for
elections and for the return of power from the United States as an occupier to a
new Iraqi regime. Being a seasoned diplomat, Sergio and his team were making
great progress and thus became a threat, not only to the Saddam "diehards" and
the fanatic Shiite Muslim leaders, but also to Israel which does not want to
have a unified strong Iraq, but a fragmented nation, rife with civil strife
between the Sunnis, Kurds and Shiites. Who directed the assassination is not
known, but on August 19, 2003 "terrorists" drove a large truck with explosives
and detonated it on the side of the UN compound where Sergio had his personal
office. Fourteen other UN officials were killed, and dozens injured. As a result
Kofi Annan ordered all UN personnel out of Iraq and thus a quick return to Iraqi
rule was lost. 1
Since I started out this series of A Trail Of Blood And
Murder, it has become apparent to me, that in order to understand what is
happening in 2004, I must lay a strong foundation of historic fact to give the
reader a chance to grasp and understand current political and military events.
So, bear with me as we journey through history. We will now pick up the story
where we left it with the March 2004 Newsletter.
BACK TO 1956
England and France had issued an ultimatum to the Egyptian Government and the
deadline for it had passed. It was Wednesday, October 31, 1956, and the
presidential elections in the United States were only one week away. National
leaders know that any United States president who is running for re-election is
going to be extremely vulnerable and not want to do something drastic which
might tip the election in favor of his opponent. So early in the morning, the
British and French governments gave the order for the invasion fleet to start
moving toward Egypt. It would take the British and French fleet six days to
arrive and be ready to attack Egypt.
Dag Hammarskjold was forced to the sideline as head of the
United Nations. All he could do at this point was to watch the "chess game" as
it was played out by different national leaders from Israel, England, France and
the Soviet Union. Egypt and Hungary were "laid out on the butcher’s block," to
be cut and carved out. The United States was tied up by the American Jewish
lobby, which put immense pressure on President Eisenhower.
The Communist leaders in the Soviet Union knew that
they would have six days to prepare the slaughter of the Hungarian freedom
fighters. They wanted to time the attack to coincide with the British/French
invasion of Egypt. That would tie the United States down and make it helpless.
Nikita Khrushchev, who was the Soviet strongman at this time and his "side-kick" Nikolay Bulganin played a game of "chicken" with President
Eisenhower. Both sides knew that they could not fight a war against each other,
both in Eastern Europe and in the Middle East at the same time. If American
troops entered into Hungary to help the freedom fighters, it would have meant
nuclear war, and the same would hold true if the Soviet Union had sent troops to
Egypt. However, the Soviets threatened to send help to Egypt and this caused
great concern for the American administration, with the result that the U.S.
government "LET THE SOVIET GOVERNMENT UNDERSTAND, THAT THE U.S. WOULD NOT
INTERVENE IN HUNGARY! This was a great betrayal, since it was the American CIA
who had enlisted, trained and told the Hungarian freedom fighters to revolt
against the Soviets.
By Wednesday October 31, the freedom fighters had taken over
Hungary and the fighting had stopped. Hungarian Army units had switched sides to
join the Freedom fighters. Imre Nagy (1896-1958) the Hungarian
prime minister had abolished one party rule and demanded that Soviet troops
withdraw from Hungary. Soviet tanks began to withdraw from Budapest, the capital
of Hungary and for the moment it looked like the Hungarians had won their
freedom. Imre Nagy now proclaimed his intention to take Hungary out of the
Warsaw Pact. 2 The Hungarian Army leadership
released the Roman Catholic Cardinal, Josef Mindszenty, who at that time
was 64 years old and had been put in prison by the Soviets in 1949 for what they
called "anti-Soviet activities." The Hungarian people were jubilant, and did not
know that the ruthless Soviet ambassador to Hungary, Yuri Andropov
(1914-1984), who later became the head of the dreaded KGB, was planning a
crushing blow to the Hungarian uprising.
THE EGYPTIAN FRONT
The Israeli military command knew that their time of fighting
would be limited, as the United States eventually would impose a cease fire on
all of the combatants. The Israeli army consisted of 47,000 soldiers who had
been intensively training to reach combat status. Opposing them were 30,000
Egyptian troops and the poorly trained Palestine division. Israel had total air
superiority with 155 combat aircraft, plus 60 French jet fighters flown by
French pilots. Egypt could only muster 70 combat aircraft. Ariel "Arik"
Sharon (born 1928 and current prime minister of Israel, 2004) was the
commander of the 202nd Paratroop Brigade. His orders were to race as
fast as his unit could move across the desert to meet up with the 1st
Battalion of the 202nd brigade which had parachuted deep into
Egyptian territory to take the Mitla Pass. The Israeli unit only met light
resistance and was able, by Wednesday October 31, to reach the 1st
Battalion. Sharon’s unit was now 80 miles away from the nearest Israeli army
unit which were slower in advancing.
The Mitla Pass was defended by two Egyptian battalions and an
Egyptian armored brigade operating 15 miles north of the Mitla Pass. As soon as
Sharon had connected with the 1st battalion, he requested permission
from the Israeli army command center to move toward the Mitla Pass and take it.
His request was denied. He then asked for permission to send a reconnaissance
unit toward the pass and this was granted. Sharon disobeyed orders, instead
moving a large force toward the pass and by midday the Israeli paratroopers
entered the pass which is very narrow with steep canyon walls. A three mile
section of the pass was only 150 feet wide. The Egyptian forces were dug in at
this section and when the Israelis entered, they were fiercely resisted. So many
vehicles were destroyed that all radio contact with Sharon was lost. A runner
was dispatched and Sharon then sent two reinforced companies to flush out the
Egyptians. It took the Israelis two and a half hours of heavy hand-to-hand
combat to kill or capture the Egyptian soldiers. A number of Israeli vehicles
were destroyed and 38 Israeli soldiers were killed with 120 wounded. The
Egyptians lost 150 soldiers, some of them killed after they had been captured.
The Israeli Army Chief of Staff Moshe Dayan
(1915-1981) was not only leading a military campaign, he also had to make
political decisions. He was told by the Israeli prime minister that England and
France might back out at the last moment and therefore Dayan could not commit
any tank units in the attack on Egypt, until it was clear if the English/French
invasion would take place. If England and France decided not to attack Egypt,
then Israel would be in a very bad position politically. If no tanks were
committed, Israel could lie and say that it was only "mopping up" Egyptian
terrorists and then quickly withdraw its forces.
The attack on Egypt was a three pronged attack. In the south
racing toward Sharm el-Sheikh was the 9th Mechanized Brigade under
the command of Colonel Avraham Yoffe. Their drive toward the southern tip
of Sinai was very hard since there was no road in place on this side of Sinai.
The attack to the north of the Sinai desert was led by Colonel Yehudah Wallach
and consisted of the 4th and 10th Infantry Brigades and
the 7th Armored Brigade. The Israeli force met fierce resistance from
the Egyptian Army, and the overall commander of the Sinai forces, Brigadier
General Assaf Simhoni, disregarded the order from General Dayan and
ordered the 7th Armored Brigade into the battle at once. Dayan became
extremely upset that he did not have control over his field commanders, but once
the war had started there was nothing he could do about it. Egyptian forces
resisted heavily and the Israelis were stalled by Wednesday evening.
The Israeli Prime Minister Ben Gurion was suffering from the
flu, and he became very anxious as the day wore on. The ultimatum from England
and France to Egypt had expired at six a.m. and by noon there were no British
and French bombers over Egypt. Gurion now expressed doubt to his staff that
there would be an attack by England and France, and that Israel had been lured
into a trap which could result in their being designated as an aggressor by the
UN. The reader must understand that the British, French and Israeli governments
were operating in secrecy because they had lied to the United Nations, to the
U.S. government, and the international media. The Mossad was not able to inform
Ben Gurion quickly enough why the bombing had not started, and it was not safe
for Ben Gurion to call his counterparts in London and Paris to find out what the
problem was. Furthermore, the Sixth Fleet of the United States was slowly
cruising around the coast of Egypt and Israel, and if the American president was
provoked, it could mean a disaster for the Israeli forces moving in the Sinai
By three o’clock in the afternoon there were still no
bombing, and Gurion got involved in a heated debate with his chief of staff.
Gurion ordered that all Israeli troops withdraw from the Sinai Peninsula. Dayan
refused to obey the order, and a compromise was struck: Israeli troops would
stop advancing further into Egypt and only fight if they were attacked. Israeli
army units would not go on the attack until bombing had begun by the British and
LONDON AND PARIS
The Anglo-French bombing had been delayed for two reasons. Originally the
military planners in France and England had decided to send in the bombers at
night to avoid losses to their aircraft. This had later been changed and orders
were given to send the bombers out at daylight, the first wave taking off from
the islands of Malta and Cyprus. As the first wave of bombers took off, the
British Prime Minister Eden learned from intelligence reports that the main
airport outside of Cairo had 15 large U.S. Air Force transports on the ground to
evacuate Americans and that the road to the airport was filled with buses
carrying some 3000 American citizens from Alexandria. Eden panicked and ordered
the Defense Minister, Anthony Head, to stop the bombers at any cost. At the last
minute, radio messages reached the bombers and they turned quickly and returned
to their bases without unloading their ordinance.
It was not until 7 p.m. Cairo time, 25 hours after the
ultimatum had been delivered, that the bombing of Egypt began. For the next two
days, 200 Canberras, Venoms and Valiants and 40 French Thunderstreaks bombed
economic targets in Egypt and wiped out much of the Egyptian Air Force on the
THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT
Prime Minister Eden had misled the British Parliament including his own
conservative party. The Wednesday session of the Parliament became very tense as
members of the Labor Party began to question the prime minister about what was
happening in Egypt. Labor leader, Hugh Gaitskell (1906-1963), tried to
have Prime Minister Eden inform the Parliament about British military plans, but
Eden refused to answer: Gaitskell then made the following public statement in
the Parliament (House of Commons): "This is really a fantastic situation. Not
only Opposition members, but the whole House and the whole country are waiting
for an answer to this question. I ask the prime minister again – I do not ask
him to disclose troop movements – I ask him simply to tell the House, the
country and the whole world whether the decision has been finally taken that
British and French troops shall invade the Canal Zone." Eden refused to
As the day wore on, members of the house continued to press
Eden and his foreign minister, Selwyn Lloyd (1904-1978). Finally the
question was asked by Gaitskell, "Was there any secret agreement between
Britain, France and Israel?" Without hesitation, Lloyd lied publicly on the
floor at the House of Commons, when he stated, "There was no prior agreement
between us about it." At 10:29 p.m. Lloyd officially announced to the
Parliament that bombing had commenced against Egypt. A great commotion broke out
and the House session was closed in disarray.
Anthony Eden received some more bad news during the day, his
Anthony Nutting, a high official in the British Foreign Office resigned
in protest of Eden’s policies in the Middle East. It is very interesting that
both Eden and Lloyd denied their secret agreement with Israel until their
deaths. The full truth was revealed in 1967, when Anthony Nutting went public
and told the whole story. However, the British Government kept denying it. Lord
Mountbatten, First Sea Lord of the Admiralty and in charge of the British forces
during the Suez crisis , recorded an interview with BBC which was to air after
his death. When he died in 1979 the British Government ordered that the
interview would not be aired to the public. Lord Mountbatten had been a
strong voice of dissent during the entire time, leading up to the invasion of
Egypt. Whatever he said was damaging to the governments of England, France and
CURTAIN FALLS IN SYRIA
Few people have understood that in public politics there is
another power which is the real power, directed by the World Government
and carried out by different intelligence services from the nations in the
world. In April, 1956, it was decided that Syria was to be destabilized and
given a new regime. Agents from the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS)
and the CIA met in London to discuss how they could stage a coup in
Syria. The project was led by George Kennedy Young, a deputy
director of the SIS. Allen Dulles sent his personal undercover representatives
for the Middle East, Wilbur Crane (Bill) Eveland and James
Eichelberger from the Cairo CIA station to meet with the British.
Young informed the American CIA agents, of a new British policy, calling for the
subversion and overthrow of the governments in Syria, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
According to Young, these three nations were a threat to the national security
The British plans did not fully line up with American
policies. The two Dulles brothers were working on a plan to take out Nasser and
replace him with the Royal Saudi family and thus they did not support the SIS
plan for Saudi Arabia. The Dulles brothers had no love for Syria, thus the SIS
and the CIA started planning to overthrow the Syrian government. At this time,
Iraq had a pro-British government so the British intelligence services operated
freely in Iraq. The Syrian Government had been working with Russia and
Czechoslovakia to build a huge refinery in Syria. This was not acceptable to the
Western powers. There were two powerful American oil companies operating in
Iraq, Standard Oil of New Jersey (Exxon) and Mobil, which were part owners of
Iraq Petroleum Company. The Dulles brothers, who were setting the policies for
President Eisenhower, had a problem; the U.S. Congress was not interested in aid
to any Arab country. The Dulles brothers then came up with a solution, Congress
would be bypassed and money would be used from a secret CIA fund to put in a bid
to build the refinery in Syria. By secretly funding the bid from the American
Oil Companies, the Communists would be undercut. Bill Eveland came to Washington
D.C. on July 20, 1956 and had a meeting with Herbert Hoover,Jr.,
Undersecretary of State and Allen Dulles, where he was informed about the scheme
for the refinery. On his way back to Beirut, Syria, he stopped in London and
again met with George Young. The British intelligence officer complained that
the U.S. was not moving fast enough on Syria. Eveland then flew on to Beirut,
where he met on July 23 with the CIA director for the Middle East, Kermit
Roosevelt, the latter working to set up the new American policies. Eveland
was then told that the CIA had selected Mikhail Ilyan, a Syrian and the
leader of the National Party and a former foreign minister of Syria, to become
the new leader of Syria as soon as a coup could be staged. Ilyan was a rich
landowner and well connected within, political circles in Syria. He was not a
Muslim, but a Christian and thus more benevolent toward Israel.
But on Wednesday, October 31, 1956, a very angry Mikhail
Ilyan confronted Bill Eveland in Beirut and declared:
"Thanks to God I’m
alive to see you and say what a terrible thing you and your government did. The
Israelis are right now headed for the Suez Canal! How could you have asked us to
overthrow our government at the exact moment when Israel started a war with an
The curtain of the SIS/CIA plot for Syria was closed and
the intelligence agents had to leave "with egg on their faces." Exxon and
Mobil had to take a back seat to the State of Israel.
During the day of October 31, Eisenhower’s anger had subsided and he was feeling
somewhat depressed. In a telephone conversation with Senator Knowland who
had called the president from California, Eisenhower made the following
"It is difficult for us to put ourselves in their (the
British) shoes. I think they made a bad error from their own viewpoint. I think
it is the biggest error of our time, outside of losing China. I am afraid of
what will happen. But don’t condemn the British too bitterly."
Henry Cabot Lodge
The United States introduced a resolution in the Security
Council of the UN for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Egypt and the end of
hostilities from England and France toward Egypt. According to his staff,
President Eisenhower’s mood improved after he was informed that Dag Hammarskjold
had handed a note to the United States’ permanent representative to the United
Nations, Henry Cabot Lodge (1902-1985). Here is what Hammarskjold wrote:
"This is one of the darkest days in postwar times. Thank God you have played
the way you have. This will win you many friends."
The ambassador from
Colombia had told Lodge that 21 Latin American countries were behind the
President as never before. Support had been received from diplomats in Africa,
Asia, Europe and Canada. Even the Soviet Union had lined up with the United
States. But the Jewish Lobby in Washington D.C. was not pleased with Eisenhower
and the pressure was applied hard for the president to back off and give Israel
support in its war with Egypt.
The vice president at this time was Richard Nixon
(1913-1994) and he was not a friend of the State of Israel. The administration
staff considered Nixon to be a "hothead," who had to be controlled. Nixon had
called Secretary of State John Foster Dulles during the day and said that he
wanted to use the Suez crisis as a campaign issue during the last days of the
presidential campaign. Dulles told Nixon to be moderate, but Nixon objected to
this. Instead he said this:
"What’s wrong with condemning Britain and
Dulles replied: "Nothing particularly – it it’s in
moderation. We are of the same civilization, the same beliefs and so on. The
President has said throughout he wants to do what is right regardless of the
election. He will not sacrifice foreign policy for political expediency."
Nixon replied: "How
do you analyze it politically?"
Dulles: "You are the political expert."
Nixon: "We will lose some Israeli votes."
Wednesday was a very busy day at the White House. Eisenhower
had decided to cancel any further campaigning for his re-election bid and would
instead address the nation. The following information will show us again that an
American president is not really in charge, but it is his handlers who are
setting the policies. John Foster Dulles was in charge of the speech, and the
professional speech writer, Emmet Hughes, was the editor. At 3:15 p.m.
Hughes was given the draft written by Dulles, but it was too rambling to be
used. Eisenhower ordered a new speech, with the telecast scheduled for 7:00 p.m.
Dulles and Hughes met in the Cabinet room, while Eisenhower was outside playing
As Hughes was re-writing the speech, Dulles was reading it
page by page, and a number of changes were made. Forty five minutes before air
time, Hughes went to the president’s bedroom to show him the final draft of the
speech. Eisenhower read it aloud while he was dressing and said that he liked
the speech. His comment to Hughes was this: "I want to be sure we show clearly
in here how vital we think our alliances are. Those British – they’re still my
Fifteen minutes before Eisenhower was going to speak to the
American people, he arrived at the Oval Office. During this time Hughes was
underlining with grease pencil the parts of the speech which the president was
to emphasize, handing the president one page at a time. Four minutes before
seven, Eisenhower received the last page and made this remark: "Boy, this is
taking it right off the stove, isn’t it?"
Eisenhower was a good actor, and he spoke with a strong
voice, being confident, and his face calm and serious. He told the American
people that he had not been "consulted in any way about any phase of the
Anglo-French-Israeli attacks," and that he thought them in error. "To say
this is in no way to minimize our friendship with these nations, nor our
determination to maintain those friendships. We are fully aware of the grave
anxieties of Israel, of Britain and France. We know that they have been
subjected to grave and repeated provocations. Nonetheless, the United Nations
represents the soundest hope for peace in the world."
What the president said in reality was, that as the American
president he had been kept in the dark and had no clue as to what was happening
in the Middle East. Once he found out, he was not happy, but nevertheless the
U.S. would back the three nations who had attacked Egypt. It was a blatant
lie that Egypt had provoked the three nations to attack.
Eisenhower also mentioned Hungary in his speech. He
praised the Soviets for their withdrawal of tanks from Budapest and assured the
Communists that the U.S. had no interest in pulling Hungary into NATO. Thus the
American president sealed the fate of the Hungarian people by letting the
Communists know that regardless what the Soviets did in Hungary, the U.S. would
RICHARD NIXON AND BILLY GRAHAM
It is extremely interesting that in 1972 when Richard Nixon was president, he
met with Billy Graham (Born 1918) in the Oval Office and the following
conversation was recorded on audio tape, which was released by the National
Archives in February 2002, when more than 500 hours of audio recording from the
Nixon presidency was made available to the public.
During their private conversation in the Oval Office Billy
Graham expressed disdain for what he saw as Jewish domination of the media in
the United States. In Graham’s own words:
"This stranglehold has got to be
broken or this country is going down the drain."
Nixon: "You believe
Graham: "Yes, sir."
Nixon: "Oh boy. So do I. But I can’t
ever say that, but I believe it."
Graham: "No, but if you get elected a
second time, then we might be able to do something."
At a later point in their conversation Nixon raises the
subject of Jewish influence in Hollywood and to this Graham responds:
of Jews are great friends of mine. They swarm around me and are friendly to me.
Because they know that I am friendly to Israel .... so forth. But they don’t
know how I really feel about what they’re doing to this country, and I have no
power and no way to handle them."
Nixon: "You must not let them know."
The American (Jewish) media later picked up this story.
Comments like this from the well known world evangelist were extremely damaging
to the Jewish leadership so pressure was applied to Graham. On Friday, March 1,
2002 Billy Graham issued a press release, which stated the following:
"Although I have no memory of the occasion, I deeply regret comments I
apparently made in an Oval Office conversation with President Nixon some 30
years ago. They do not reflect my views and I sincerely apologize for any
offense caused by the remarks. Throughout my ministry, I have sought to build
bridges between Jews and Christians. I will continue to strongly
support all future efforts to advance understanding and mutual respect between
When this press release was made public, Billy Graham was 83
years old and in bad health, battling Parkinson’s disease. Whether the press
release came from Billy Graham or from his "handlers" is up to each reader to
judge. The facts remain, Billy Graham spoke forcefully about the Jews in 1972,
but in 2002 he cannot remember even having said this. This incident again shows
the power of the American Jewish leadership and that even powerful politicians
and religious leaders will bow to their demands.
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1956
As economic targets and military installations were being bombed in Egypt, which
resulted in the death of many civilians, the House of Commons was called into a
session which became so stormy, that it had to be closed down. Members of the
Parliament cried aloud and called Prime Minister Eden and his party "fascists,
cowards and murderers." When Eden entered the chamber he was booed as the
opposition demanded to know what kind of policies were being carried out.
Labor leader, Aneurin Bevan (1897-1960), gave an
intense speech in which he strongly chastised Eden and his party for attacking
Egypt and lining up with France and Israel. As Egypt at this time stood alone,
he reminded them that England had stood alone in 1940 against the onslaught of
Nazi Germany. He then said: "Then we had honor on our side." He compared
Britain’s ultimatum to Egypt with Germany’s to Norway in 1940. He then stated
this: "We have only to substitute Egypt for Norway. It is exactly the same
thing. It is the language of the bully."
A Labor motion to censure Eden failed 324 to 255, which
was a vote along party lines. On the streets of London and in other cities
people went out en masse, demonstrating against the shameful attack on Egypt by
England. Eden become a prime minister under siege and the British people were in
In the meantime, the bombing continued and the British/French
invasion fleet was steaming full speed toward Egypt where a number of soldiers
on all sides would die, including hundreds of civilians, many of those being
children. The Jewish World Government had spoken, Israel needed more land and it
did not matter how many people died as long as land was added to Israel.
And Christian Zionists proclaim that it is the will of God
for Israel to expand and take back the land that God had once given to Israel.
But thou shalt remember the Lord thy God: for it is he that
giveth thee power to get wealth, that he may establish his covenant which he
sware unto thy fathers, as it is this day. And it shall be, if thou do at all
forget the Lord thy God, and walk after other gods, and serve them, and
worship them, I testify against you this day that ye shall surely perish. As
the nations which the Lord destroyed before your face, so shall ye perish;
because ye would not be obedient unto the voice of the Lord your God.
To be continued…
is important for the reader to remember that during the last 12 months the
Israeli government has ordered the assassination of several top leaders in the
Palestinian Hamas movement, and that the Israelis have been very successful in
killing a number of Hamas leaders.
This was the Soviet counterpart to NATO, and was made up of the Soviet Union and
all Communist Eastern European countries.
Back to 2004
All Scripture references are taken
from the King James Bible.
Copyright © 2004 – European American Evangelistic Crusades (EAEC), Inc.
P.O. Box 41001, Sacramento, California 95841 USA
This data file/publication is the sole
property of European American Evangelistic Crusades (EAEC), Inc. This data
file/publication may not be used without the permission of
EAEC for release or the enhancement of any
other product sold; this includes all of its content with the
exception of a few brief quotations. It may
be reproduced only in its entirety for circulation as "freeware," without
Permission is granted for printing or copying
in its entirety this data file/publication for the reader's personal use or to
pass on to family and friends. Permission is also granted to post this data
file/publication in its entirety on a website, web page or ftp site as long as
it is not altered or edited in any way, and all reproductions of this data
file/publication MUST contain this copyright notice:
Copyright © 2004 – European American
Evangelistic Crusades, Inc.
P.O. Box 41001, Sacramento, California 95841 USA