IS AIDS MAN MADE?

THE STRECKER MEMORANDUM - 1988

We have a story to tell you, a very strange story, one that affects you, me, and every other human being on earth. A story that must be taken seriously by the governments of every nation in the world because there may not be many humans left to govern by the turn of the century, or shortly thereafter. A story so bizarre, and so sinister that, if it were not for the fact that it is all true, it would make a great science fiction thriller. [12]

The  story begins in 1983 with Dr. Robert B. Strecker, M.D., Ph.D. who practices internal medicine and gastroenterology in Los Angeles. He is a trained pathologist and holds a Ph.D. in pharmacology. Dr. Strecker and his brother Ted, an attorney, were preparing a proposal for a health maintenance organization (HMO) for the Security Pacific Bank of California. They needed to know the long-term financial effects of insuring the treatment of AIDS patients. In as much as this information was not readily available in 1983, both brothers began researching the medical literature to learn what they could about this relatively new disease. The information they uncovered was so starling that it dramatically altered their lives and lead them on a five year quest, culminating with the creation of “The Strecker Memorandum,” a controversial video and a remarkable set of documents called “The Bio-Attack Alert.” 

WHAT THEY DISCOVERED

Right there in the medical literature for anyone to read for themselves was, basically, proof that the AIDS virus and pandemic was actually predicted years ago by a world famous virologist, among others. They found that top scientists writing in the “Bulletin of the World Health Organization” (WHO) were actually requesting that AIDS-like viruses be created to study the effect on humans. In fact, the Strecker’s unearthed thousands of documents supporting the man-made origin of AIDS.

Meanwhile, the governments were telling everyone that a green monkey in Africa bit some native and started AIDS. As their research continued, it became obvious from the documentation that the virus was not only created as requested, but actually deployed, and now threatens the existence of mankind because it does what it was designed to do: cause cancer in humans via a contagious virus. Eventually, the Streckers came to realize everything the government and the so-called AIDS experts were telling the public was not only misleading, but outright lies… The truth of the matter is:

• AIDS is a man-made disease

• AIDS is not a homosexual disease

• AIDS is not a verneral disease

• AIDS can be carried by mosquitoes

• Condoms will not prevent AIDS

• There are at least six different AIDS

THE SCARIEST PART

The most dreaded fear that all oncologists (cancer doctors), virologists and immunologists live with is that someday cancer, in one form of another, will become a contagious disease, transferable from one person to another. AIDS has made that fear a reality. If you think that you are safe because you are not gay or promiscuous, or because you are not sexually active, then you must watch “The Strecker Memorandum” very carefully.

IF YOU PLAN TO HAVE SEX TONIGHT YOU HAD BETTER READ THIS

The most common misconception being foisted upon us right now concerns sexually active Americans. We are told that if a man uses a condom, the transference of the deadly virus is virtually eliminated. Nothing could be further from the truth. Of all the body fluids where the AIDS virus is found, semen contains the least. As a matter of fact, in every single study ever published on the subject, no one has found a significant amount in anyone’s semen. It just isn’t there in huge numbers. There is usually about one virus per milliliter, a statistically irrelevant amount. One copious ejaculation might produce only two or three viruses. This is substantiated in the medical literature.

But, just for argument’s sake, let’s say all the medical studies are wrong. Let’s pretend that there are countless millions of AIDS viruses in the ejaculation. Are you aware that condoms are riddled with microscopic or larger holes?  Studies show that even the smallest holes found in condoms are two to ten times larger than the AIDS virus. It’s like shooting a golf ball through a basketball hoop. Condoms have not, will not, and cannot prevent AIDS.

THOUSANDS ARE ALREADY DEAD

Over one hundred thousand Americans have already died (1985) because they did not know the truth about AIDS. Approximately 23 million Americans are already infected. More than one in 60 babies born in New York City is infected; three in 100 college students in America are infected; one in 20 aliens applying for amnesty is infected, including men, women and children. These are just some of the facts you are not likely to hear from the media.

WHY A VIDEO?

One of the first things the Streckers did was to try and tell their medical and legal colleagues what they were finding in the literature. Some were interested; most were not. Certainly no one was prepared to risk their professional standing by making waves within the establishment.

Ted Strecker compiled some of the most damaging documents into a report he called “The Bio-Attack Alert” and sent it to the governor of every state, the president (Reagan), the vice-president (George Bush), the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, and selected members of Congress. He got a grand total of three replies from three governors; nothing from the government.

Both he and Dr. Strecker were laughed at and ridiculed at every turn. As an example, Dr. Strecker told the government in 1985 that virtually every person testing positive for AIDS would die prematurely and painfully. The government said that was nonsense. Their figures showed that maybe ten percent at most would die from the disease.

In 1986, the government said maybe 50 percent of those infected would die, in 1987, they said maybe 75 percent, in 1988 they finally agreed with Dr. Strecker that AIDS is virtually 100 percent fatal.

We could go on with facts Dr. Strecker unearthed that the “experts” said were wrong and now accepted as truth.

Dr. Strecker, like a good scientist, submitted paper after paper with his findings to all the prestigious medical journals in America. They refused. He then tried to have his findings published in Europe. Again, closed doors. What to do? Dr. Strecker did not feel he could take the time from his practice and his research to write a book. On the other hand, everyone has a television and now (1987) most households have a video cassette recorder (VCR).

The time involved to make a video is nothing compared to writing a book, and so “The Strecker Memorandum” video was created. It is 96 minutes of the most startling controversial and information-packed video you will ever see, and disputes virtually everything the American public is being told by the government, the so- called AIDS “experts” in the media. In fact, after seeing it YOU will know more about AIDS than 99 percent of all doctors in America.              

MUSIC IS NOTHING WHEN THE AUDIENCE IS DEAF

With the video made, it seemed a simple matter to advertise it and the world would become aware of what it was facing, right? WRONG! The fact that you are even reading about “The Strecker Memorandum” is a minor miracle by itself, in as much as television stations have refused to advertise it. Television and radio time brokers that sell blocks of commercial time have refused to sell us time. Television station managers have refused to even air programs containing interviews with Dr. Strecker.

A national radio network did an interview with a famous talk show host and Dr. Strecker and then refused to run it. Virtually every big name television network show, magazine, and all the syndicated TV interviewers and talk show hosts have said “No” to Dr. Strecker.

Big city newspapers will not take any print ads telling about it, and so it goes…Why? What is in “The Strecker Memorandum” that sends a cold chill down the spine of most media executives?

WHY IS EVERYONE AFRAID?

The excuse we hear over and over is that it is too controversial. Too controversial? They say that this information, if widely disseminated, will cause the public to panic. If someone had poisoned your water supply and you and your family could die, would you want to know about it? Would you panic? Or would you more likely be outraged and try to find out who did it and punish them? We feel the only persons who might panic are those scientists who willingly or otherwise created AIDS and are now promoting misinformation by covering it up. After all, if you made AIDS, would you tell anyone about it?

THINK OF YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS…NOW THINK OF THEM DEAD

It may take a while before the words “species threatening” sink in, because the term has rarely been used before to describe an existing human condition, but once you realize the implications of that term, and realize that, unlike any other kind of disease ever known to man, past or present, AIDS can, if unchecked, kill every human on earth, then your outlook and attitude regarding everything in life must change. Whether you like it or not, and despite all your precautions, the time will come when you will test positive for AIDS, and it can happen much quicker than you realize.

IT’S OUT THERE

The number of AIDS-infected people is doubling approximately every 12 months, and in some areas even sooner. With 23 million Americans carrying the virus, you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to see how long we have here in the U.S. Africa has conservatively 75 million infected; some estimates double that. Brazil as a country is in serious jeopardy because all through the 1970’s they were buying their blood supply from Africa. On top of that, the World Health Organization conducted a large scale small pox vaccination program there in the 1970’s.

Southern Japan has at least 30 present infected with HTLV 1, the leukemia causing virus (although you never hear about that on television). Russia is now reporting AIDS as a problem. Cuba has already set up concentration camps for AIDS-infected, and they are full (you won’t see that on television either). Haiti of course, is ravaged by AIDS; more than 20 percent of the people are infected and getting worse every day. And so it goes. Virtually every nation on earth with few exceptions (Iran is one) is reporting a growing problem. It’s on every continent, every sub-continent, and every island chain, Atlantic and Pacific. So why won’t the media or government tell you these things? Is it too controversial for you to handle? Are you going to panic?

IS THERE ANY HOPE?

Yes and no. No, if you are waiting for the government to create a magic bullet. As you will see in “The Strecker Memorandum,” part of the problem is that all the various AIDS viruses are “recombinant retroviruses.” Very simply, that means they have the ability to recombine with the genes of any cell they enter and the offspring or new viruses they form are different from the parent viruses.

HTLV III alone (that’s the most common American AIDS virus) has the mathematically ability to change itself to the 9,000^th power. The common cold recombines much less frequently and we haven’t found a cure for it after a hundred years. Besides does it make much sense to entrust the cure of AIDS to the same people that may have created it?

Yes, there is hope if Dr. Strecker and a growing number of realistic scientists are correct in looking at alternative, non-allopathic, non-drug modalities based in Raman spectroscopy. In fact, much research is going on now that offers great promises. Unfortunately, our government takes a dim view of any type of treatment for any type of disease – let alone AIDS – that does not conform to its rigid rules for acceptance, registration and legalization. Of course the FDA would definitely like to see an allopathic drug treatment or cure presented by an ethical drug company or university.

Well, we don’t think that’s going to happen. Because of this attitude, much experimentation in America must go underground, underfunded or out of the country entirely. Again, this is explained further in “The Strecker Memorandum.”

BE BOLD AND MIGHTY FORCES WILL COME TO YOUR AID OR MIGHTY FORCES WILL COME AND KILL YOU

An ominous personal aspect of this story has been the sudden and unexpected deaths of two of key players. First, Dr. Strecker’s brother, Ted Strecker, was found shot to death in his home in Springfield, Missouri, an apparent suicide, on August 11, 1988. Was Ted Strecker suicidal? Perhaps. In the past he suffered from depression and monumental frustration at the relative lack of interest in his findings. Dr. Strecker spoke with him the night before his death. Ted was cheerful, in good spirits, and looking forward to certain new developments that promised progress. The next day he was found dead, his 22-caliber rifle next to him. No note, no message, no goodbyes to anyone. Officially a suicide.

Next, Illinois State Representative Douglas Huff of Chicago was found alone in his home, dead from an apparent overdose of cocaine and heroin on September 22, 1988. Representative Huff did everything in his power to make the Illinois State Legislature and the people of Chicago aware or Dr. Strecker’s work. He was very vocal, gave many press interviews, was constantly on television and radio urging people to wake up to the cover up concerning AIDS. Did Representative Huff use drugs? Perhaps. Was he an addict? No. Would he have known how dangerous a massive overdose of cocaine and heroin was? Yes, of course. Cause of death; officially a stroke. 

Dr. Strecker has serious doubts that his brother killed himself. Representative Huff’s associates doubt he died accidentally, and yet they are gone. Who’s next?

IGNORANCE IS BLISS, OR IS IT SUICIDE?

We all know it is easier for a king to have a lie believed than a beggar to spread the truth. Well, we are spreading the truth about AIDS. Unfortunately, it isn’t pretty. But the fact is you are not being told the truth by the government or the so-called AIDS experts.

The media, for reasons of their own, will not present information contradicting the official propaganda. So you can choose to go along with the same people who gave us brain cancer (SV-40 virus) as a result of their contaminated polio vaccines in the early 1960’s; a polio-like disease from their contaminated Swine Flu vaccine in the 1970’s; and AIDS from their smallpox and hepatitis B vaccines; or, you can at least make yourself aware of the clear and present dangers that we all face by watching “The Strecker Memorandum.” The cost of the video is nominal, but we submit that remaining ignorant can cost infinitely more.

BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AGAINST AMERICAN CITIZENS

A once free United States has become an “us” versus “them” society. Similar to the early Hitler years in Germany (burning of the Reichstag building = Waco massacre) with touches of Stalinist horror (extermination of the “kulaks.”) [13]

The late Gary Allen (of “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” fame) used to cite Nelson Rockefeller’s habit of terming Americans as “peasants.” But Gary had no idea how far elitist contempt for to be “peasants” had gone even in the late 1960’s

Compare Waco with Somalia.[14] The FBI and BATF used tanks to destroy Koresh and his followers. The U.S. deliberately used tanks against American citizens. In Somalia the U.S. sent in Rangers and U.S. troops without armored backup, although assaults without tanks and self propelled artillery are doomed to failure. The White House threw away 7 American lives using McNamara “rules of engagement” in Somalia. In Waco the “rules of engagement” concept was thrown out the window.

Disregard for American life is emphasized in domestic use of biological warfare against American citizens. Part of the story was in Phoenix Letter (November 1992.) This described Congressional approval for U.S. Army development of an artificial AIDS virus in 1970. This shocker is part of a larger story.  Here’s another installment of the domestic biological warfare story:

• U. S. Army-CIA jointly used biological agents against American citizens inside the U.S.

• These agents included: bacillus subtilis, smallpox and AIDS.

• The Federal Government has concealed then lied about these programs and placed the blame elsewhere, including the former Soviet Union.

• The State Department attempted to counter an exaggerated Soviet propaganda war using these programs but tripped up because State did not know how much authentic information had been leaked inside the U.S.

FORT DIETRICH BIOLOGICAL PROGRAMS IN THE 60’S

Fort Dietrich in Maryland is the U.S. biological warfare base. Originally called U.S. Army Biological Laboratories it is now labeled U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID)

The Army maintains a Special Operations Division (SOD) on the Fort Dietrich base with a formal operating agreement with CIA (Memorandum signed in May 1952.) Both CIA and Army have covered their tracks well but some original documents survive to outline a horrific story.

In the early 1960’s U.S. Army SOD personnel used specially designed suitcases to spray unsuspecting American civilians with bacillus subtilis at the Greyhound Bus Terminals in Washington, Chicago and San Francisco. Similar operations were conducted at airports in Washington D.C., New York, Boston and Los Angeles. The number of one way tickets sold at time of release was used to estimate distribution of the bacterial agents. (Bacillus subtilis can be bought at biological supply houses. It is not listed as a pathogen, but can cause respiratory infections like blood poisoning and food poisoning.)

SOD-CIA agents at work
This team member was photographed while operating his suitcase sampler at a news stand at the Greyhound bus terminal.	Team members took air samples near crowded Gate 7 (top) and among departing passengers (bottom) in the Greyhound bus terminal in Washington D.C., to measure the amount of Bacillus Subtilis with which passengers would be infected.	(Photocopies obtained by FREEDOM under the Freedom of Information Act.)

According to declassified Army documents, the Greyhound terminals in San Francisco and Chicago were the location for “six operatives to launch covert attacks” spread over 7 days. Specially designed suitcases sprayed bacteria into crowded terminals for maximum exposure. Photographs were taken and other Army personnel “covertly collected air samples in close proximity to the passengers” to determine if the civilians had been infected.

Later tests were repeated with smallpox agents, grown in large quantities and converted to a lethal powder for spraying. Senate investigation in 1975 revealed close cooperation between SOD and CIA:

“CIA association with Fort Dietrich involved the Special Operations Division (SOD) of that facility. This division was responsible for developing special applications for biological warfare agents and toxins. Its principal customer was the U.S. Army. Its concern was with the development of both suitable agents and delivery mechanisms for use in paramilitary situations. Both standard biological warfare agents and biologically derived toxins were investigated by the division.”

The Senate Committee found the CIA had covered its tracks to conceal this unconstitutional activity from the American public. The Senate Committee stated:

“Although some CIA originated documents have been found in the project files it is clear that only a very limited documentation of activities took place.”

An extract from a U.S. Army report details why smallpox was selected as the “agent of choice.” Its “attractive” features are listed as:

1. Smallpox is highly infectious with close contact. It spreads readily from an infected person to susceptible individuals.

2. A long incubation period of relatively constant duration permits the operatives responsible to leave the country before the first case is diagnosed.

3. The duration of illness for those who recover is relatively long. Although the Federal Government claims that the 1972 treaty banning biological weapons stopped further use of Fort Dietrich we know that the U.S. Army applied for $1.4 million appropriation to EXPAND germ warfare testing ability in the early 1980’s. Senator James Sasser objected and it is unlikely that the appropriation went through. It could have been handled on the “black budget.”

THE ORIGINATOR OF AIDS

In July 1969 Dr. MacArthur, Director of the U.S. Army Advanced Research Project Agency (ARPA) appeared before Congress (the Appropriations Committee of the House) and stated:

“…within a period of 5-10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.”

This synthetic agent is AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency syndrome virus or HIV-1) ARPA requested $10 million to develop AIDS, 10 years before the virus was identified in the field.

Dr. MacArthur added, “It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to another method of massive killing of large populations.”

From 1961 to 1968 while this artificial biological agent was under discussion in the Pentagon, Robert McNamara was Secretary of Defense.[15] Clark Clifford (of BCCI notoriety, a failed British bank) took over as Secretary in 1969. [16]

On October 2, 1970 just 15 months after Dr. MacArthur requested an appropriation for AIDS development, Robert McNamara, now World Bank President, made a speech to international bankers in which he identified population growth as “the gravest issue that the world faces over the years ahead.”

In his speech to the bankers McNamara argued that population growth was leading to instability, that a 10 billion world population would not be “controllable.”

 McNamara said, “It is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not sure but there are two possible ways by which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way.”

In brief, Robert McNamara was in the final decision making role for development of AIDS at the very time he was contemplating the idea that “world death rates must got up.” THIS IS MORE THAN COINCIDENCE.

Our conclusion is that Robert McNamara knowingly encouraged development of AIDS as a means to reduce the world’s population. It is difficult to arrive at any other conclusion.

NEW FROM RUSSIA

Slowly bits and pieces of hidden history are leaking from Russia. Official U.S. history is that the U.S. was fighting only Vietnamese in Vietnam. It now appears Soviets were there as well, fighting the U.S. The Soviets had casualties, so far 16 admitted killed in action.

This explains the heat this editor came under with “National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union.” A detailed criticism of our technological aid to the Soviet Union while the Soviets were aiding the Vietnamese to kill Americans. No wonder we came under so much pressure to keep quiet! Our big businessmen were actively committing treason! If the Soviets were fighting in Vietnam, then the Soviets were an active enemy, not a passive onlooker.

Henry Kissinger[17] and Robert McNamara won’t look too good in the light of history when the full story comes out. “The Best Enemy Money Can Buy” is a rewrite and update of the original “National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union” which caused a storm 20 years ago.)

SOVIET UNION CHARGES PENTAGON WITH AIDS DEVELOPMENT

This information became known to the Soviets and in October 1985 the Soviet Union mounted a worldwide propaganda campaign. AIDS had been manufactured at Fort Dietrich Maryland by the Pentagon. The initial information was planted in a Soviet backed newspaper in India and then surfaced in more than 30 media sources worldwide. The report was backed by an East German report by Professor Jacob Segal of Humbolt University, East Berlin. Segal argued that the AIDS virus is “the product of an abortive experiment carried out at a laboratory to develop biological warfare means.”

Pravda: October 31, 1986 - “The AIDS virus, a terrible disease with no cure was, according to western researchers, created in Pentagon laboratories.” (SPID = AIDS) In Balloon: “Virus “AIDS” “Pentagon SPIDtsialist” (In Russian a play on the words “SPID” and “specialist”)

This Soviet propaganda campaign was discounted in the West (this Editor included.) It was beyond the realm of rationality that the U.S. would develop a killer agent such as AIDS. Professor Segal appears to hold the view that it was “accidental” i.e. an “abortive experiment.” This position we also held for a while, until the McNamara speech of October 1970 surfaced.

In any event, in the late 1980’s the U.S. State Department ran a rebuttal campaign to the Soviet charges. However State was unaware that Congress had published Dr. MacArthur’s requests and statements so the rebuttal fell flat on its face. The State Department for example claims the U.S. Army had never used Fort Dietrich as a biological warfare base. This is just not true. Further State apparently had no knowledge of the McNamara contemplation of rising death rates by design.

Conclusions

1. CIA - U.S. Army undertook field tests with bacillus subtilis and smallpox against American civilians.

2. There is no question that the Army received funds from Congress for AIDS development and this was probably undertaken at Fort Dietrich.

The AIDS release could have been accidental but we discount this for several reasons. Initial cases came from Africa and Haiti; not the United States. Second, Robert McNamara had simultaneously called for increase in world death rates. This suggests a deliberate policy of controlled release of the AIDS virus.

3. The Soviets obtained the information and used it for a propaganda campaign. The State Department rebuttal was ineffective because State had no idea how much information had already been made public.

Postscript

Phoenix Letter has reported a new string of AIDS virus, much tougher, much more dangerous and possibly airborne. In early 1990, Science reported that AIDS researcher Dr. Robert Gallo had tested an altered AIDS virus, one that could infect cells previously left uninfected by the early AIDS strain. This new strain was reported as infecting epithelial cells thus raising the possibility that the AIDS virus is now airborne.[18]

We find it extraordinary that any risks are taken today, after the Cold War has ended with these agents. What is the rationale in developing stronger airborne strains?

ROBERT McNAMARA AND DEVELOPMENT OF AIDS

In the December Phoenix Letter we described how the U.S. Army (ARPA) developed the AIDS virus with ten million dollars voted by Congress in 1969.

The Secretary of Defense at that time and responsible for approval of the 1969-1970 budget, was Robert McNamara, followed by Clark Clifford of BCCI notoriety. The final decision for the AIDS program was made by McNamara and Clifford.

The standard biography of Robert McNamara Promise and Power (The life and time of Robert McNamara) by Deborah Shapley (Little Brown, Boston 1993) has interesting comments on the McNamara view of world over population and the critical need to reduce world population i.e. an excellent rationale for development of a virus resistant to cure.

In 1966 McNamara warned that world population was growing faster than gross national product and that the World Bank had a dominant role to play.

In 1969 McNamara’s speech to the Governors of the University of Notre Dame cited the population explosion as more significant than the danger of nuclear war. “Casting its shadow over all this scene is the mushrooming cloud of the population explosion” (page 480). McNamara extended the extraordinary thesis that “the children who were dying were fortunate for the millions of those who lived languidly on were stunted in their bodies and cripples in their minds.”

Shapley points out that inside the World Bank these McNamara views on population “sounded almost nutty” and many wondered where McNamara had gotten these ideas. But this was precisely the time when McNamara moved from Secretary of Defense to take over the World Bank and in the same year 1969, when the U.S. Army went before Congress to ask for $10 million to develop an AIDS virus.

By 1973 (page 510), McNamara had steered the World Bank to explore the cycle of overpopulation, insufficient food and poverty and in the Fall of 1973 at the annual meeting of World Bank Governors in Nairobi, Kenya, outlined his QUANTITATIVE GOALS for population. “Nairobi” became synonymous with the McNamara population reduction five year plan. Coincidentally Nairobi and Kenya became initial focal points for the AIDS virus. Kenya and Uganda in East Africa is where the epidemic began and where today some 50% or more of the population is infected.

In 1977 McNamara spoke at MIT and argued that world population was exploding at an unacceptable rate. McNamara was so intensely carried away with the ideas of population explosion that he reportedly (at a lunch meeting) started to scribble numbers on the dining room table cloth, “there was no stopping his verbal torrent or his emotion.” The table cloth was tinged with scribbled numbers and “looked like an artifact left by an ancient visitor from another world.” (page 560)

The Shapely book has a great deal more on the McNamara fervor to control world population. While development of an AIDS virus may appear to most of us as tragically even murderously wrong, to an ideologue like McNamara it would appear to be opportunity to solve what he saw as potential disaster.

Matching the time frames and the opportunities for decision making there is a least a prima facie case; well worth investigating, that Robert McNamara knowingly and deliberately encouraged development of the AIDS virus.

Phoenix Letter views the McNamara program, continued by Clark Clifford, as genocide.

BOOK REPORT: AIDS – THE UNNECESSARY EPIDEMIC

Dr. Monteith was one of the very first to recognize the significance of AIDS and has devoted over 20 years of his life to investigation and warning about the dangerous nature of the disease to everyone in his book “AIDS: The Unnecessary Epidemic.”[19] We distinctly remember meeting with Dr. Monteith as far back as 1981 when he prophetically laid out to this Editor the epidemic potential in AIDS. This long before even African governments had recognized the killer potential. [20]

This book, excellently written and produced, contains Dr. Monteith’s conclusions and is far in advance of other AIDS books simply because he is well aware of the elitist nature of the world control. The neglect of government and politics to face up to the disease and its implications is clearly outlined and we are left with the question that this is deliberate neglect to destroy the United States? Although Dr. Monteith does not touch on the documentary evidence published in Phoenix Letter concerning the roles of U.S. Army (Fort Dietrich) and Defense Secretary Robert McNamara (indeed this would be irrelevant for the medical approach) Dr. Monteith’s evidence is entirely consistent with the argument that there is deliberation in the spread of AIDS.

More surprising we learn in great detail how the Gay Lobbies are insistent in policies and actions that encourage the epidemic.

You will read that Congressman Panetta[21]and Congressman Waxman[22] of Los Angeles are associated with policies that promote the epidemic. How the American Medical Association, Centers for Disease Control, and the Surgeon General attack any doctor who dare propose monitoring or controlling the disease. The numbers of HIV infected are just not known, they are mere crude underestimates because Government refuses to adopt procedures that would give us a realistic count.

Leon Panetta	Henry Waxman

For your personal protection we urge you to read this book. It will be a harsh dose of realism to counter the propaganda pap issued by Government and AIDS lobbies.

AIDS Was Deliberately Created By the United States Government

AIDS is a synthetic biological agent, knowingly and deliberately created by the United States Government. Development funds were not included in any secret “black budget,” they were openly voted on by Congress.

In 1969 Department of Defense (DOD) representatives appeared before the Defense Subcommittee of the House and requested $10 million in 1970 DOD Appropriations for design and manufacture of a synthetic AIDS virus.

Specifically, on Tuesday, July 1, 1969, Dr. MacArthur of the Army Advanced Research Project Agency made the following statement to the Subcommittee:

“There are two things about the biological field agent I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technical surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of five to ten years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.”

MacArthur later submitted more detail to the Congressional Committee. The key points were:

1.       Up to this point, (1969) all biological agents are naturally occurring.

2.       It is possible to make a “new infective micro-organism” that would be “refractory to the immulogical and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious diseases.”

3.       A research program would take six years and $10 million.

4.       The program should be initiated through the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council (NAS-NRCI.

5.       The matter was discussed with NAS-NRC and “tentative plans were made to initiate the program.”

The report added:

“It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to another method of massive killing of large populations.”

By 1972, the World Health Organization called on scientists to work on such viruses “to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on the immune function.” (WHO is supposedly devoted to “health” progress and financed in part by the U.S. taxpayer on this supposition. [23]

Dr. Robert B. Strecker, a health care consultant, has tracked the story of AIDS through WHO and collaboration with U.S. Army Laboratories in Fort Detrick, Maryland (now National Cancer Institute.

Apparently, the AIDS virus was released in Uganda, Haiti, Brazil and Japan about 1972-74. This was not an accident. It was deliberate release.[24] AIDS entered the United States through the New York Blood Center/Centers for Disease Control in the late 1970’s.

In conclusion, we note that Congress knowingly voted funds for this development program in the 1970 Appropriations.

Extract From House of Representatives Department of Defense Appropriations for 1970 Hearings Part 5

1969

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970

PART 5: RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION

Department of the Army

Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency

Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering

Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations

129 – Tuesday, July 1, 1969

Synthetic Biological Agents

There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing vary rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been secured.

Mr. Sikes:  Are we doing any work in that field.

Dr. MacArthur:  We are not.

Mr. Sikes:  Why not?  Lack of money or lack of interest?

Dr. MacArthur:  Certainly not lack of interest.

Mr. Sikes:  Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be and the time and the cost involved?

Dr. MacArthur:  We will be very happy to.

The information follows:

The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations.

1. All biological agents up to the present a time are representatives of naturally occurring diseases and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research either for offensive or defensive purposes.

2. Within the next 5 or 10 years it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any know disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refectory to the immune and respiratory processes upon which we depend on to maintain our relative freedom from infectious diseases.

3. A research program to ensure the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 6 years at a total cost of $10 million.

4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program.  Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientists in this field. Almost all are in University laboratories and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council (NAD-NRC).

The matter was discussed with the NAS-NRC and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However, decreasing funds and growing criticism of the CD program and our reluctance to involve the NAS-NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.

It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations.  On the other hand without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible and the understanding of the ways it could be done, there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures should an enemy develop it. There is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program. [25]

AIDS EPIDEMIC COVER UP

HIV-AIDS is a virtually out of control epidemic with government officials and gay lobbies jointly imposing censorship to hide the true picture from the American public.

Half a dozen books have emerged in recent months which tell similar stories: gay lobbies control AIDS policy and they are only interested in preserving gay rights, despite whatever happens to the rest of America.

Because of their united lockstep, political power gays dominate the AIDS political scene. Gay rights have absolute precedence over public health.

There is disturbing evidence that the virus is transmitted by more than sexual contact and blood. It is certainly carried by saliva (one testing procedure is based on saliva) and may be airborne. Initial experiments demonstrate airborne capability. Government officials dominated by gays refuse to follow up with research on these initial findings, because the gay lobby fears monitoring and quarantine. Right now AIDS has the potential to wipe out the world but is not treated as an infectious disease. Doctors cannot routinely monitor, test and report; they are restricted by official limitations not applied to other infectious diseases.

We attach a list of recent books well worth reading that spring the lid on a criminally negligent policy. Some of our conclusions come from these books:

1. HOW MANY AIDS CASUALTIES

Government has no really accurate number of HIV-AIDS infections because gay lobbies vehemently oppose any form of monitoring or reporting. The latest government number of one million HIV infections is guess work; this is a low end guesstimate. But even official guesstimates are reporting 50 to over 100 million infected within five years.

Kenya in Africa has 50-70% infection rates in cities, while rates are unknown in the countryside. New York Times reports Kenyan hospital system overloaded two AIDS patients to a bed, and many are just placed in corridors.

Dr. Lorraine Day, former surgeon at San Francisco General Hospital, and outspoken critic of head-in-the-sand government policies, states the epidemic has the potential “to wipe out the world.” [26]

Gay-lesbian lobbies/outlets report much lower numbers than even the government. Example: San Francisco Examiner (19 January 1994) column “AIDS WEEK,” by Lisa M. Krieger, reports 339,000 “cases” in U.S. compared to the official 1 million, itself low. The same column reports 3 million worldwide “cases,” a more accurate figure is well over 10 million.

2. HOW CAN ONE BECOME INFECTED?

This is where the politics of HIV-AIDS becomes murky and public health abandoned in favor of special interests. Back in 1981, San Francisco and New York medical authorities determined that gay bathhouses were killer institutions where the AIDS virus was flourishing and passed through homosexual contact. Gay organizations fought against closure, the bathhouses ultimately closed only because their patrons were killed off one by one by the disease. Gays placed their civil rights ahead of public health and paid the price. At this point, infection was limited to gays.

Then the blood supply became infected with the virus. Gays protested because blood organizations bypassed gay areas for blood collection. By early 1980’s it was generally thought that infection could only take place sexually or through blood transfer.

Research into infection routes was blocked by the gay lobbies. Dr. G. Johnson of Stanford Medical Center, in 1988, determined that HIV could be transmitted through the air. Dr. Johnson asked San Francisco AIDS unit to request further research at the federal level on airborne transmission.

SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL REFUSED TO PURSUE THIS LINE OF RESEARCH

Why? Because S.F. General policy on AIDS is essentially influenced by active gay lobbies who fear monitoring and quarantine. If AIDS is determined as transmitted only by sexual contact and blood supply, then proposals for quarantine can be fought off. However, if AIDS can be passed through the air or through saliva, then the general population is placed at risk and public health measures will be instituted to limit contact. Gay districts will be isolated. Restaurants and facilities employing gays will be affected. Obviously the community, seen as the source of HIV-AIDS, will face quarantine.

Similarly, gays have always denied that the virus can be passed through kissing i.e. saliva and most doctors advise this is unlikely. Again, research organizations have not investigated saliva transmission because their policy is biased by gay organizations. When Phoenix Letter advised its readers in 1993 to keep out of high priced San Francisco restaurants, the item was picked up by the San Francisco Chronicle and labeled hysteria.

What the Chronicle refused to report is that an AIDS test system manufactured by Saliva Diagnostic System Inc. uses saliva as the vehicle for mass testing. Rocky Mountain News (November 20, 1993) reported that the company had a contract with a Hungarian health organization to undertake the largest mass testing ever, using its OMNI-SAL system at a Budapest rock concert. Saliva is used for testing in Hungary but in the United States is not considered a means of transmission.

An obvious public health measure, not undertaken at this date in 1994, is to determine the parameters of HIV-AIDS infection. Certainly HIV-AIDS can be passed through sexual contact, blood supply and contact, saliva and urine. These are definitely established as transmission routes.

There is also preliminary evidence that HIV-AIDS can be transmitted through aerosol (coughing droplets) and can be airborne. The federal government has been grossly negligent in this area. We suspect that political pressure by gay lobbies has stalled the research.

Gay pressure is so irrational in San Francisco that hospitals cannot put AIDS patients in separate waiting rooms to prevent transmission of airborne diseases as tuberculosis, fatal to AIDS patients. Gays fear stigma of isolation and rather accept the risk of possibly fatal infection from tuberculosis and other infectious diseases.

This confusion of civil rights with public health is killing people and very few public health officials or medical doctors have the guts to stand up and tell the truth, that HIV-AIDS may possibly use numerous transmission routes.

3. DOES HIV-AIDS MUTATE?

We are not dealing with the same HIV-AIDS strains today that were encountered in the early 1980’s. The strains are tougher, mutate more easily and even have a facility to convert antibodies (generated by the body to fight off disease) into the virus itself i.e. convert the body’s defense into AID’s allies.

This ability of the AIDS virus to turn the tables on the human immune system has never before been reported in any virus or bacterium.

San Francisco virologist, Dr. Jay Levy at University of California, who discovered the phenomenon says, “This indicates on the molecular level how some viruses are able to learn to escape the immune system.”

This ability is significant because it frustrates efforts to find an anti-AIDS vaccine. The virus can quickly change the molecular make up of its outer envelope.

This suggests we are many years from an AIDS vaccine because researchers do not yet know what the vaccine has to do to defeat the virus.

We are looking at 100 million infections within six years so the urgency is obvious, at least to the Phoenix letter, the federal government is stalling on research.

As the virus originated within the U.S. Army laboratories at Fort Detrick, Maryland, the federal government at least owes its citizens the courtesy of speedy cures. What we are getting is denial and double-talk.

This is only part of the story we have uncovered. You won’t get it from establishment media simply because they are scared of creating panic. Our view is that citizens would rather know and handle panic if and when it comes. Historically, citizens have always performed to higher standards than politicians expect.

What is urgently needed is congressional hearings which are not influenced by gay lobbies. Gay rights may have to be subordinated to overall public health welfare in the interests of the majority. This statement will probably bring vitriolic criticism upon the head of the Editor but with 200,000 U.S. citizens dead and at least 1 million infected, we have to make some tough decisions.

Recommended Reading on the AIDS Epidemic

(1)    Dr. Stanley Monteith, AIDS: The Unnecessary Epidemic (Covenant House Books, 1991.) Highly recommended. Dr. Monteith first alerted this Editor to the coming epidemic as far back as 1981 after Dr. Monteith returned from a trip to Africa.

(2)    Dr. William Campbell Douglass, AIDS: Why Its Much Worse Than They’re Telling Us and How to Protect Yourself and your Loved Ones (1991.)  Second Opinion Publishing Inc. Dr. Douglass also has a newsletter updating information on AIDS and government misdeeds in medicine.

(3)    Dr. William Campbell Douglass, Who Murdered Africa? Booklet

(4)    Dr. Alan Cantwell, Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot (1993) Dr. Cantwell is a gay dermatologist who concludes that AIDS is a genocidal plot. Excellent!

(5)    Dr. Lorraine Day, AIDS: What the Government Isn’t Telling You, Rockford Press.

(6)    Carol Pogash, As Real as it Gets, Birch Lane, 1992.

(7)    Some Call it AIDS: I Call it Murder, Dr. Eva Lee Snead, Aum Publications, 2 volumes 1,000 pages.

Note on Publishers

Every one of the above books (except Carol Pogash) is published by a small publishing house or is self published and they all deserve widespread distribution.

In the last decade the New York publishing industry has shrunk. In January, Harcourt Brace, a major New York house reduced its editorial staff to just two editors. Self-important New York publishing is suffering from its own myopia, an incestuous industry rooted in establishment thinking is falling rapidly, its place taken by small publishers scattered around the United States.

Once all publishing was centered in New York. The above AIDS books were published in California, Georgia and Texas. The publishing aroma in New York is so stifling, reflecting self-important pompous editors, that we rarely find a New York published book worthy of favorable review. Gary Taubes Weird Science (Random House, reviewed in Phoenix Letter, December 1983) is typical of the trash generated by old line once proud houses as Random House.

Book review: Carol Pogash, AS REAL AS IT GETS (Birch Lane Press, New York, 1992.)

San Francisco General Hospital is the epicenter of the AIDS epidemic in the United States. This is the story of the political, medical and ethical battle that has been fought at San Francisco General Hospital over the past ten years.

This is a disturbing account, how HIV - AIDS has generated a complex reaction of fear, heroism, irrational behavior, and denial fought over the bodies of dead and dying AIDS patients.

Here are a few highlights we gleaned from Pogash:

• Nurse Jane Doe was infected with AIDS while caring for patients at S.F. General - on the job occupational injury. The City of Francisco tried for years to deny compensation, bury its head in the sand. City Hall didn’t want to face the reality of the epidemic.

• Dr. Lorraine Day, an orthopedic surgeon, smart, tough, realistic, dedicated, and was demonized by the gay community because she wanted to protect the medical staff and the general public.

• Incoming patients, about one quarter of whom has AIDS cannot be routinely tested because the gay community considers testing an infringement of their rights. Anyone who points out that non-gays have rights also, is viciously attacked.

• AIDS policy is largely established by the gay community that places its own interest first and foremost and to hell with the general public, this in a city “saturated” with AIDS.

• Dr. Lorraine Day, “The whole thing is politics. If this had started out in the heterosexual community the disease would be under control… we’ve got  two different things now, we’ve got gay rights to have proper jobs, housing and all that and we’ve got a deadly disease that can kill the world, and the two are being mixed up.”

• Dr. Day was abused, threatened, harassed, EVEN TARGETED FOR ATTEMPTED MURDER BECAUSE SHE TOLD THE TRUTH. And she was out there all by herself because no one at San Francisco General would support her - even though they knew the truth.

God Help Us!