The 2012 Presidential Election

We are down to just a few weeks before the 2012 American presidential election and the media is doing its best to whip everyone into a frenzy by releasing news polls that show where the candidates stand. Most people don’t know this is part of the campaign strategy of the unseen hands behind the candidates to tell the people how to vote. With their massive campaign of polls, the mass media is essentially saying the election is a foregone conclusion because Obama is going to win, so why even bother to vote? The conclusion is that there is no need for Republican voters to show up at the polls.

In 2009, I wrote an extensive article about Barack Obama entitled, “The Obama Election Charade” and later that year wrote another article entitled, “The Perfect Manchurian Candidate.” In February of 2012 I wrote yet another article entitled, “The Election Charade Continues.” After reviewing these three articles, I felt there wasn’t a whole lot more to say about the 2012 election. Obama and Romney both have Jewish handlers and it doesn’t matter to them who wins the race; each candidate is dedicated to the defense of Israel and putting Israeli interests before American interests. They are deeply connected to the banking industry in New York and none of them poses a threat to the tightening control of the American people.

WHO SHOULD A CHRISTIAN VOTE FOR?

Who should a Christian vote for when your choice is devil number one or devil number two? There isn’t a whole lot of difference right? Actually, there are differences that do not depend as much upon the candidates as the political parties they represent. There are a large number of born again Christian leaders in the Republican Party with a very small minority in the Democratic Party.

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

If you want to know the philosophy of any organization you must ask the following questions:

1) Who are the leaders in the organization?

2) What are the goals of the organization?

3) What people group is targeted by the organization?

4) Where does the money come from?

Prior to 1815, there were two major political parties in the United States, the Federalists and the Democratic - Republican Party. The Federalist Party ceased to exist after 1815. There was a power struggle in the Democratic-Republican Party in 1824; the end result was that the party split and the group that pulled out unsuccessfully supported Andrew Jackson for president in 1824. The splinter group was more successful in the 1828 presidential election when Andrew Jackson was elected president and the splinter group officially named itself the Democratic Party.

THE ILLUMINATI

Adam Weishaupt sent his agents early to America, and by 1815, most of the freemasonic lodges had been infiltrated by the Illuminati. He was always looking for people that had flawed characters to be recruited by his agents and Andrew Jackson, the 7^th President of the United States, was one such man.

At the age of 13 he had been captured by the British and almost died of small pox. His mother and two brothers were killed during the revolutionary war. As a law student in Salisbury, North Carolina, he was known for being a hard drinker who liked to fight and commit vandalism when he was drunk.

He was a politician first in the Tennessee’s Constitutional Convention, served briefly in the U.S. Senate and also as a Congressman. After serving as an attorney in 1801, he was able to buy himself a commission in the Tennessee militia and was appointed the rank of colonel. In 1802 he was appointed the rank of major general.

Jackson became a Freemason in 1800 and most likely was recruited by the Illuminati. His deeds as a general and a judge on the Tennessee Supreme Court indicate that he was following the policies of the Illuminati.

He was active as a general during the war of 1812 with the British and repelled an invasion at New Orleans by a British force in 1815. He also fought the Indians with great cruelty and was responsible for the forced removal of large number of Indians from their land. Jackson had a large plantation and owned more than 300 slaves who worked his cotton fields.

As a general, he ordered the execution of numerous of his men for disobeying orders or showing mutinous behavior. Jackson’s personal interest was dueling, and he was involved in more than a hundred of them, killing a number of people he challenged. His personal habits were of heavy smoking and drinking.

Jackson was also the president that introduced the “the spoil” system to the federal government, which meant that when a new president took office, all the directors of the different cabinets were fired and the new president brought in his cronies, who in turn could bring in their cronies. This is a guaranteed system to produce corruption that has worked for the last 180 years.

This is the man that the Democrats revere and refer to as the founder of the Democratic Party and set its future policies.

Jackson opened up the Democratic Party for the Illuminati, and if we compare what the Illuminati did in Europe, there is no doubt that these events and policies came from this sinister organization. An op-ed by Jeffrey Lord in The Wall Street Journal on August 13, 2008, reviewed the history of the Democratic Party from around 1840 through 1964 and showed how it has been sanitized to fit the current leadership of the party. This is the history that has been removed:

There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms supporting slavery. There were six from 1840 through 1860.
There is no reference to the number of Democratic presidents who owned slaves. There were seven from 1800 through 1861.
There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms that either supported segregation outright or were silent on the subject. There were 20, from 1868 through 1948.
There is no reference to “Jim Crow” as in “Jim Crow laws,” nor is there reference to the role Democrats played in creating them. These were the post-Civil War laws passed enthusiastically by Democrats in that pesky 52-year part of the DNC’s missing years. These laws segregated public schools, public transportation, restaurants, rest rooms and public places in general (everything from water coolers to beaches). The reason Rosa Parks became famous is that she sat in the “whites only” front section of a bus, the “whites only” designation which was the direct result of Democrats.
There is no reference to the formation of the Ku Klux Klan, which, according to Columbia University historian, Eric Foner, became “a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party.” Nor is there reference to University of North Carolina historian Allen Trelease’s description of the Klan as the “terrorist arm of the Democratic Party.”
There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution. The 13th banned slavery. The 14th effectively overturned the infamous 1857 Dred Scott decision (made by Democratic pro-slavery Supreme Court justices) by guaranteeing due process and equal protection to former slaves. The 15th gave black Americans the right to vote.
There is no reference to the fact that Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was passed by the Republican Congress over the veto of President Andrew Johnson, who had been a Democrat before joining Lincoln’s ticket in 1864. The law was designed to provide blacks with the right to own private property, sign contracts, sue and serve as witnesses in a legal proceeding.
There is no reference to the Democrats’ opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1875. It was passed by a Republican Congress and signed into law by President Ulysses Grant. The law prohibited racial discrimination in public places and public accommodations.
There is no reference to the Democrats’ 1904 platform, which devotes a section to “Sectional and Racial Agitation,” claiming the GOP’s protests against segregation and the denial of voting rights to blacks sought to “revive the dead and hateful race and sectional animosities in any part of our common country,” which in turn “means confusion, distraction of business, and the reopening of wounds now happily healed.”
There is no reference to four Democratic platforms, 1908-20, that are silent on blacks, segregation, lynching and voting rights as racial problems in the country mount. By contrast the GOP platforms of those years specifically addressed “Rights of the Negro” (1908), opposed lynching (in 1912, 1920, 1924, 1928) and, as the New Deal kicked in, spoke out about the dangers of making blacks “wards of the state.”
There is no reference to the Democratic Convention of 1924, known to history as the “Klanbake.” The 103-ballot convention was held in Madison Square Garden. Hundreds of delegates were members of the Ku Klux Klan, the Klan was so powerful that a plank condemning Klan violence was defeated outright. To celebrate, the Klan staged a rally with 10,000 hooded Klansmen in a New Jersey field directly across the Hudson River from the site of the convention. Attended by hundreds of cheering convention delegates, the rally featured burning crosses and calls for violence against African-Americans and Catholics.
There is no reference to the fact that it was Democrats who segregated the federal government, at the direction of President Woodrow Wilson upon taking office in 1913. There is a reference to the fact that President Harry Truman integrated the military after World War II.
There is reference to the fact that Democrats created the Federal Reserve Board, passed labor and child welfare laws, and created Social Security with Wilson’s New Freedom and FDR’s New Deal. There is no mention that these programs were created as the result of an agreement to ignore segregation and the lynching of blacks. Neither is there a reference to the thousands of local officials, state legislators, state governors, U.S. Congressmen and U.S. Senators who were elected as supporters of slavery and then segregation between 1800 and 1965. Nor is there reference to the deal with the devil that left segregation and lynching as a way of life in return for election support for three post-Civil War Democratic presidents, Grover Cleveland, Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt.
There is no reference that three-fourths of the opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Bill in the U.S. House came from Democrats, or that 80% of the “nay” vote in the Senate came from Democrats. Certainly there is no reference to the fact that the opposition included future Democratic Senate leader Robert Byrd of West Virginia (a former Klan member) and Tennessee Senator Albert Gore Sr., father of Vice President Al Gore.
Last but certainly not least, there is no reference to the fact that Birmingham, Ala., Public Safety Commissioner Bull Connor, who infamously unleashed dogs and fire hoses on civil rights protestors, was in fact--yes indeed--a member of both the Democratic National Committee and the Ku Klux Klan.

Reading the DNC’s official “Party History” of the Democrats and the race issue and civil rights is not unlike reading, “In Through the Looking Glass:” “ ‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less.’ ”

Here’s this line from the DNC: “With the election of Harry Truman, Democrats began the fight to bring down the final barriers of race . . .” Truman, of course, was elected in 1948, and to his great credit he did in fact, along with then-Minneapolis Mayor Hubert Humphrey, begin to push the Democrats towards a pro-civil-rights stance. This culminated in the passage of the 1960’s civil rights laws legislation that redid what had been done by Republicans a hundred years earlier but undone by the Democrats’ support for segregation. But the notion that “Democrats began to bring down the final barriers of race” raises the obvious questions. What were these barriers doing there in the first place? And who exactly was responsible for creating them?

(1) Acknowledges that slavery is incompatible with the basic founding principles recognized in the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal;

(2) acknowledges the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow;

(3) apologizes to African Americans on behalf of the people of the United States, for the wrongs committed against them and their ancestors who suffered under slavery and Jim Crow; and

(4) expresses its commitment to rectify the lingering consequences of the misdeeds committed against African Americans under slavery and Jim Crow and to stop the occurrence of human rights violations in the future.

What word is missing here?

You got it. The word “Democrat.” Never mentioned anywhere. As with the DNC website, all these terrible things--somehow, apparently, it seems, so they keep hearing--happened. Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Cohen and their fellow House Democrats just can’t understand how. But, you know, whatever. They are sorry. Really.

Are they? Let’s take them up on this.

After all those Democratic platforms and conventions that championed slavery and segregation, what do you think the chances are they will use the occasion of Mr. Obama’s nomination to have the Democratic platform formally apologize for the active, frequently violent and decidedly official support of the Democratic Party for slavery, segregation, lynching, the Ku Klux Klan and all the rest?

Better yet, do you think they’ll pass a resolution promising to use the funds raised from all those Jefferson-Jackson Day fundraisers to pay reparations for slavery? (Did I mention that while the DNC discusses party co-founders Jefferson and Jackson, it neglects to mention that between them the two owned an estimated 360 slaves?)

Will the NAACP and other groups seeking reparations from nongovernmental entities for their role in supporting slavery (companies like Aetna, Wachovia and Chase along with educational institutions like Brown University) finally zero in on the prime historical mover behind some of the worst chapters in American history? Will they sue the Democrats?

The Democrats are poised to nominate a black man for president of the United States. But will they apologize for slavery? Will they start paying reparations not from tax dollars but from their own dollars for what they have done?

Do they have the guts to publicly admit what serious history records of their deeds? Are they capable of running a campaign without playing the race card as they have played it for the better part of two centuries? Can they even escape the race psychology that has indelibly branded them as America’s Party of Race?

Or, when it comes to their own responsibility for race relations in America, will they order up more of what, under the circumstances, is a very appropriate word for the DNC website?”^[1]

WHO ARE THE DEMOCRATIC LEADERS?

The leadership of the Democratic Party since the 1900’s has consisted of wealthy east coast families. The Kennedy’s are one such family who hold a socialistic/Marxist view. There has never been a poor Democratic national leader, as a matter of fact, the majority of them are multimillionaires. All of them have made fortunes in the business world or inherited their wealth. Barack Obama became wealthy by the time he was elected senator from the state of Illinois and Nancy Pelosi and her husband are wealthy business people from the San Francisco Area. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer are two American Jewish senators from California, both are multimillionaires and so is Senator Harry Reid from Nevada.


Nancy Pelosi	Dianne Feinstein	Barbara Boxer	Harry Reid

There is nothing wrong with working hard and becoming rich but why are all these prosperous people leaders in a party that wants to strip the wealthy of their fortunes and distribute them to the working class? There is only one answer that makes sense and that is that they will exempt themselves if they succeed in forcing these policies on other people. This is how business was and still is run in Russia, China, Cuba, Vietnam and other socialist/Marxist dictatorships.

If we look behind these leaders, there are other groups behind the scenes with their own leaders, who are not generally known to the American people. First, there is a number of American Jewish organizations that are part of the Democratic machine like the World Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Congress, B’nai B’rith and a number of lesser known Jewish organizations. This explains why most American Jews always vote democratic. Then there is the media and entertainment industry with Hollywood at the center. Since most of the people running it in the United States are Jewish it should not come as a surprise that money is flowing into the coffers of the Democratic Party from these people and corporations, including Hollywood stars coming out to endorse democratic candidates and policies. Since the media and entertainment industry is a promoter of a sleazy lifestyle, it makes sense for them to support a party that rejects the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Jesus Christ, and makes money through moral filth.

Then there is another group of organizations called labor unions. Since the early part of the 20^th century, they have been controlled by criminals from the Italian and Jewish mafia. Some of the most well-known leaders were Jimmy Hoffa, Bugsy Siegel, Lucky Luciano, Arnold Rothstein, Frank Costello, Carlo Gambino and Vito Genovese.

These mafias or crime syndicates control the Long Shore Union, the Teamsters and a majority of other American labor unions. Chicago is famous for the grip the mafia has on the Democratic Party machine. Let’s not forget the gambling industry in Atlantic City, Las Vegas and Reno and a number of other American cities. The American pornography industry is in the hands of the Jewish mafia and centered in Hollywood. Prostitution and drugs are controlled by the different mafias, including the Mexican and South American mafias which are making inroads into the United States.

Thus the different mafia’s in the United States are funneling money to the Democratic Party through the labor unions since they deem it to be more lenient toward their criminal activities.

There is also the National Education Association (NEA) is responsible for the deterioration of the American Public schools and the National Organization of Women (NOW) is a hard core promoter of abortions with its liberation of women agenda. Both of these groups are solidly behind the Democratic Party.

Most of the politically active homosexuals are deeply involved in the Democratic Party and there are a number of very militant homosexual organizations that are putting a lot of pressure on Democratic political leaders. Gay & Lesbian Activist Alliance (GLAA), Gay Activist Alliance (GAA) and Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) are some of the better known militant homosexual groups.

Another small but vocal and militant group is the American Atheists who have aligned themselves with the Democratic Party.

Each of these groups has been able to put some of its members into local and national leadership of the Democratic Party.

WHAT ARE THE GOALS?

The major goal of the Democratic Party is one that was set by the Illuminati some 200 years ago and that would be to turn the United States into a socialistic/Marxist dictatorship, which in time could be merged with other similar nations and form the platform from which the Antichrist can rule.

One such step to a socialist/Marxist society is to socialize the medical establishment and force every doctor and nurse to work for the government in a measured health care system.

You might remember that in the mid 1990’s President Clinton commissioned his wife to push for a federal government health care system but it was met with too much resistance and the effort failed. However, with Obama in the White House, the race has been on to create a national health care system. With the Democratic Party controlling both the Senate and the House of Representatives, it became reality as the Democratic Party machine steamrolled the Republican lawmakers. The people in America are in for a rude awakening with “Obama care” as a new law.

The Democratic leaders were finally able to gloat how every American will have access to good health care. What they didn’t tell the American people is that the cost will be astronomical and they had to make cuts somewhere.

Steven Rattner is a top Democrat strategist who served as Obama’s lead auto-industry advisor who believes there must be death panels, which will determine how long care is to be given to terminally ill patients or injured persons with a small chance of surviving. He wrote that the Obama-health-care plan cannot survive financially, unless death panels are created, that will determine when a patient is to be terminated through the humane methods of starvation or a dose of lethal medication. [2]

If you think this line of thinking is far out, you need only examine the Swedish health care system to see that they have death panels and terminally ill patients are killed in order to save money.

A socialist/Marxist society cannot exist in a nation with a strong Christian church proclaiming biblical truth. Karl Marx recognized this fact and his disciples took great steps to root out the Christians in the Soviet Union and all the Eastern European communist nations from 1945 until 1990. China is known for its systematic persecution of Christians and so is Vietnam, Laos, Cuba and North Korea.

The Democratic Party cannot yet outright persecute Christians and hold them in prison, so a soft method has been used. Using the judicial system in the United States, where the judges are controlled mostly through membership in Freemasonic lodges, lawsuits were brought against prayer and Bible reading in public schools. A 1962 Supreme Court ruling stated that teacher led prayer and Bible reading was forbidden in public schools.

Since that time, numerous lawsuits have been filed by different groups and argued by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) that has removed the Ten Commandments from display in public schools and government buildings. Public displays of crosses have also been removed because the courts have ruled them to be unconstitutional on public land.

In 1973, the Supreme Court ruled that abortion upon demand is legal in the United States. Many of these court cases were directly or indirectly supported by the Democratic Party through their agents.

The 2012 Democratic administration in California in October of 2012 passed a ban on psychotherapy aimed at making gay or lesbian teenagers straight. It is now a felony for a mental health practitioner to counsel a homosexual to turn away from a sinful lifestyle and go back to a normal sex life.

Let’s not forget that the Clinton administration started to push for homosexuals to be able to serve openly in the armed forces and freely proclaim their deviate lifestyle. It was the Obama administration that broke the final barrier and now any soldier can openly be a homosexual and practice his sexual deviation while in service of the nation.

The future agenda for the Democratic Party is to legalize prostitution, marijuana and other recreational drugs, child pornography and sex between adults and children. You might think that I’m joking but the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a pedophile and pederasty advocacy organization in the United States that works to abolish age of consent laws criminalizing adult sexual involvement with minors. This organization is lobbying the Democratic Party to take up their cause. Add to this hate laws which are used against Christian preachers who challenge the immoral lifestyles of homosexuals and other sexual deviants.

If you want to find out where the Democratic Party stands in 2012, you need only revisit their convention in Charlotte, North Carolina this year. When the platform was presented to the delegates, all references to God had been removed. The Romney campaign picked up on this and made it an issue so that Obama intervened and forced the committee to re-write the platform and insert the name of God. When this was presented to the delegates for ratification, more than half stood and screamed out their disapproval. Obama did not do this because he loves God; he did this to take away a point from his presidential challenger.

Furthermore, when the Democratic convention began in Charlotte, 56 Christian Churches wanted to show Christian love to the delegates and had put together small baskets with Carolina Pralines, a letter of welcome and also offered help in transportation. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) strongly rejected this act of hospitality and declared that the values of the Democratic Party were opposed to the stand the Christian churches had on homosexuality, abortion and women’s rights.

One week prior to the convention, 100 churches in the Charlotte area sponsored a prayer rally that was attended by some 9,000 Christians. They were told to pray that God would have an influence on the Democratic convention. Obviously, even if God sent the Holy Spirit to speak to the leadership and the delegates, they refused to listen, and instead hardened their hearts in defiance against God.

Once the convention was underway, 200 Muslims showed up at the convention site and asked for permission to pray. Without hesitation, the DNC leadership welcomed them with open arms.

WHAT PEOPLE GROUPS ARE TARGETED?

The DNC leadership knows that strong Christians will not vote for them. Independent thinking Americans will not vote for them either and therefore they are targeting members of different labor unions, people on welfare, Jews, women in general, the black community, the Latino community and young people attending colleges and universities. In California, it is interesting to see that people living in the big coastal cities are mostly democrats, while people living in the inland are mostly republicans. Thus we can see the liberal education in public schools have produced a segment that is liberal and leaning toward socialism/Marxism.

WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM?

I have dealt with this issue in previous articles listed in the beginning of this write up, but I want to repeat that the money comes from labor unions, rich American Jewish billionaires like George Soros, Bill Gates, the movie stars in Hollywood and American Jewish bankers and industrialists.

AS A CHRISTIAN, WHAT CAN YOU DO?

Currently many prominent black American pastors are speaking up and urging their people to leave the Democratic Party. They are using strong language and telling their people that the values of the Democratic Party are in total opposition to what the Bible teaches.

If you examine the facts I have brought out, there is no way a born again believer in Christ can embrace the Democratic platform and vote for any of their candidates. Every sin that Satan has promoted for the last 7,000 years has been adopted by the people who make up the Democratic Party and they are working hard to make it mandatory to be “politically correct” and join them. Although the Republican Party is not a Christian party, it has a large Christian membership that has been able to insert Christian values into the platform. If you are an honest Christian and willing to find the truth, check out what I have presented and you will see the truth. Then you will have to make a decision to stand against the people of Satan or join them?

“Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.” (Matthew 7:13-20)

[1] online.wsj.com/article/SB121856786326834083.html

[2] stevenrattner.com/article/beyond-obamacare

Volume 15, Issue 6