Home Welcome Resource Center Bookstore

Svenska

Norsk Deutsch Español
               

 

January - February 2006
   

European American Evangelistic Crusades

 

The Flaming Sword
Contending For The Faith – Jude 3

 

ISRAEL'S FUTURE WAR WITH IRAN

John S. Torell

 

I want to use this newsletter to share some insights concerning disturbing events which are beginning to fill our television screens and are getting more and more attention in our newspapers.

I am sure that all of you have noticed the anger and hate boiling from Muslims around the world over some cartoons printed in newspapers in Europe. Only a few American newspapers have reproduced the cartoons; instead the different news directors have discussed what they look like, but without pictures.

Neither has the American media told us what kind of European newspapers published the cartoons, following the lead of a newspaper in Denmark. It is obvious that something bigger than normal is happening in the world, and what I believe is coming down the pipe line is not very good and will affect the entire population of the world.

THE WAR DRUMS ARE GETTING LOUDER
On March 5, 2006 the United States issued the strongest warning yet to the government of Iran, when the United States Ambassador to the UN spoke at the powerful Israeli lobby group AIPAC. Here is a quote from the meeting, which was printed in the Seattle Post Intelligencer:

By FOSTER KLUG
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

WASHINGTON The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations on Sunday told an influential pro Israel lobbying group there is an urgent need to confront Iran's "clear and unrelenting drive" for a nuclear weapons program.

John Bolton, speaking before a crowd of 4,500 gathered for an American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference, said that a failure by the U.N. Security Council to address Iran would "do lasting damage to the credibility of the council."

"The longer we wait to confront the threat Iran poses, the harder and more intractable it will become to solve," Bolton said. At issue is Iran's ability to enrich uranium to the point it could be used for a nuclear weapon. Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and only meant to generate power. Many in the West, however, fear Iran is aiming to develop atomic weapons.

The International Atomic Energy Agency will meet in Vienna, Austria, on Monday to discuss Iran's nuclear program and its compliance with an IAEA demand that it renounce uranium enrichment. The U.N. agency's board of governors may at that time send the file to the Security Council for further action.

Iranian officials were in Moscow last week, negotiating an offer by Russia to enrich uranium for Iran to be used for energy. The spent fuel would be returned to Russia, easing fears that Iran could use it for weapons.

Bolton said the Russian proposal lets Iran "reap the benefits of civil nuclear power while addressing concerns that they are really pursuing nuclear weapons."

But he said Iran has been engaging in "doublespeak" during these negotiations by saying with one voice it welcomes discussion, but with the other "flatly refusing" to give up access to technology and material to eventually develop nuclear weapons.

Iran "must be made aware that if it continues down the path of international isolation, there will be tangible and painful consequences," Bolton said.

John Bolton is a strong American Zionist and you need to remember that when President Bush tried to nominate Bolton to be the next American ambassador to the UN, there was so much resistance in the Senate that President Bush withdrew the nomination and appointed Bolton on a temporary basis as the American ambassador to the UN.

Bolton did not speak without notes and his speech had been prepared by the White House staff. Bolton declared the official policy of the Bush administration which was to send a strong message to Israel that the United States is committed to war over the issue of the Iranian nuclear program. Secondly, it was a warning to the Iranian government, "Remember Iraq, conform to US policy or be prepared for war."

NOTE: Before you read further in this newsletter, you might want to read my newsletter of May 2004, when I laid out the scenario of Israel, France and England making a joint attack on Egypt, with all the deception prior to the beginning of this war of 1956. What took place in 1956 is now repeated, the only difference is the target for this new war and a different lineup of the attackers.

ISRAEL'S FUTURE ATTACK ON IRAN
The nation of Israel is now standing at a crossroad. It was founded on deception, broken promises and violence as it came into existence in 1948. The Jewish people forced themselves into the land of Palestine and through brute military power carved out the state of Israel on the back of the Palestinian people, who lived in the land. In a number of wars, 1956, 1967, 1973 and the invasion of Lebanon in 1982, the Israeli military forces were able to not only defeat the armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan, but to smash their military power so that any future military attacks from these would be impossible. In all these wars, Israel relied on conventional weapons and the immense military backup from the United States.

From the beginning in 1948, the political leadership of Israel made a decision to develop nuclear weapons and the technological capacity to do this was either stolen from the United States through the Israeli intelligence service (the Mossad), or given by American Jews working for the United States Atomic program. The Israeli nuclear weapon program was developed in a military complex in the Negev desert and named Dimona research center. Currently the Israeli government has some 200 nuclear bombs, with some of them placed in missiles on Israeli submarines. When Saddam Hussein began to develop nuclear weapon capacity and a joint French Soviet nuclear reactor had been built in Iraq, the Israelis took no chances and in 1981 sent fighter bombers to take out the reactor.

With an Islamic population in the hundreds of millions versus the small population of Israel of only 6.5 million, Israel must remain militarily superior in order to survive. Thus the political leadership in Israel cannot tolerate that a Middle Eastern country might acquire nuclear weapons. With Iran being extremely belligerent toward Israel and a current fundamentalist Islamic government speaking of wiping Israel off the map, war is inevitable. It is noteworthy to point out that Iran is not an Arab nation, it was known in ancient times as Persia, and it was an empire before being crushed by Alexander the Great in 334 B.C.

IRAN HAS A SECRET MILITARY NUCLEAR PROGRAM (BBC 2 16 2006)
“French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste Blazy told French TV Thursday: No civil nuclear program can explain the Iranian nuclear program. It is a clandestine military nuclear program.’

"The international community has sent a very strong message to the Iranians show reason, suspend all nuclear activities and uranium enrichment. And they're not listening to us.

"That is the reason why, for the first time...the international community is united. It's not just the Europeans France, Germany, and the British it's also Russia and China."

IRAN AIMS TO DESTROY ISRAEL (Reported in the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz 2 15 2006)
"’Iran's goal is to eliminate the State of Israel,’ Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin, the new head of Military Intelligence, told the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on Tuesday.

“Yadlin stressed that statements by Iranian President Ahmadinejad about the need to ‘wipe Israel off the map’ were not mere slips of the tongue, and should be taken seriously.

“‘Iran is likely to acquire the capability for manufacturing enriched uranium in industrial quantities within six months to a year,’ Yadlin said. ‘If its nuclear program suffers no disruptions, it will have its first nuclear bomb in three to four years.’"

It is obvious that some kind of military action is planned against Iran, but before military actions can take place, the coalition of aggressors must prepare its citizens by making them believe that a war is good, it is justified, and it will benefit the people in the world. In times past attackers have used propaganda to dehumanize the so-called enemy, so the general population would feel at ease when large numbers of people were killed. This is the way Adolf Hitler prepared the German people prior to his attack on the Soviet Union in 1941. In the United States, after Pearl Harbor, on November 7, 1941, the American news media painted the Japanese people in a bad light, calling them "Japs." Despite the fact that large numbers of American-Japanese people had lived in the United States for many years, they were rounded up and kept in concentration camps during World War II. The American people felt that this was a proper action to take against these "yellow beasts" who had attacked the U.S. On the other hand, the large German-American population was not vilified. Very few German-Americans showed any sympathy toward Nazi Germany and there were large numbers of German-Americans in the United States armed forces fighting the Nazis. Very few Japanese-Americans had sympathy for Japan's war effort, but no one listened to them. Toward the end of World War II, a number of young American Japanese were drafted into the U.S. Army and sent into combat in Europe where they performed superbly, took heavy causalities and proved that they were loyal Americans.

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE
For thousands of years different political rulers have understood that to win a war it is not enough to build up an army, equip them and turn them loose in battle. The minds of people must be persuaded that they want to actually participate in the war; they are excited about the war and willing to die in the war. National pride, patriotic feelings, defending freedom, democracy, a religious belief are just a few of the causes used by the people working in psychological warfare. The late Dr. Joseph Goebbels was well known in the art of persuasion and functioned as Hitler's propaganda minister. From the early 1930s until the very end of World War II, his voice was heard on German radio, where he with a passion swayed the German people to sacrifice themselves on the battle field for Hitler and the Fatherland. Millions of Germans believed him and fought savagely to the bitter end. They did not understand that they were manipulated, so they wasted their lives for a cause that was a lie. There is no nation on the earth today that does not have a national department of psychological warfare. In the United States there are different units operating under Federal control. The foremost "spin doctor" in the United States is the Press Secretary for the White House. He is a highly paid professional liar and his job is to make sure that he feeds the "correct version" to the media, who in turn will brainwash the American people.

The State Department, the Pentagon, the FBI and the CIA all have their own units staffed by people who are hired to do only one thing, sway the American people to believe current policies and actions. Misinformation and lying are the tools used in this trade of deception. Here is an excerpt from a publication by the US Army, to show that these units exist:

PROPAGANDA MEDIA
“Propaganda Media" is based upon "Psychological Operations Field Manual No.33-1" published in August 1979 by Department of the Army Headquarters in Washington DC; and "Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Media Subcourse PO 0816" by The Army Institute for Professional Development, published in 1983.

“Propaganda Media are categorized by methods of dissemination: face to face (interpersonal), audiovisual, audio, and visual.

Face to face (interpersonal) communication is the most effective means of transmitting a persuasive message. It is employed in rallies, rumor campaigns, group discussions, lectures, show and tell demonstrations, social organizations, social activities, entertainment, and individual person to person contact, all providing a participating experience for the individual or group to recall later.

Audiovisual media such as television, electronic tape recordings, and sound motion pictures are the second most effective means of communication available to the psychological operator. Effectiveness is based on seeing and hearing the persuasive message. These media are an excellent means of transmitting persuasive messages and eliciting a high degree of recall.

Audio media (loudspeakers and radio) lend themselves to the transmission of brief, simple messages and to personalization by use of the human voice. They require little or no effort by the audience, and generally, they have more appeal than visual media. Also, the barrier of illiteracy may be more easily overcome with audio media than with visual media (printed material).

Visual media can transmit long, complex material. Animated or still cartoons may be used to convey themes to illiterate and preliterate target audiences. Visual media generally have the least amount of popular appeal.

“Themes are reinforced and the target audience given broad coverage by using several media to deliver the same basic message. For example, radio and television can augment leaflets; face to face communication can support newspaper circulation.”

Osama bin Laden's organization has an efficient operating propaganda department that is releasing audio and video recordings on a regular basis for the purpose of rallying their followers and putting fear into the people in Europe and North America.

Not only do governments have professional propaganda departments, there are political parties, business and industrial corporations, think tanks, etc., which also rely heavily on propaganda. It is named "information" or “advertisement” to make the public accept it more readily. Even false religions like Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses, Scientology, Hinduism, Islam and many more, are working hard to convert people to their religious beliefs.

God's Word, as found in the King James Bible, is the opposite of all propaganda; it is presenting eternal truth, which will last forever. Here is what Jesus said: And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. John 8:32

Jesus spoke these words to the people who rejected him as the Son of God:

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. John 8:44

When Pontius Pilate, the governor, encountered the Son of God, the following was spoken:

Then Pilate entered into the judgment hall again, and called Jesus, and said unto him, Art thou the King of the Jews? Jesus answered him, Sayest thou this thing of thyself, or did others tell it thee of me? Pilate answered, Am I a Jew? Thine own nation and the chief priests have delivered thee unto me: what hast thou done? Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence. Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice. Pilate saith unto him, What is truth? And when he had said this, he went out again unto the Jews, and saith unto them, I find in him no fault at all. John 18:33 38

Pilate was a politician representing the Empire of Rome. As a Roman governor, his job was not only to keep the population in Palestine under control, but also to indoctrinate them to believe the political directives from Rome. Thus this human "spin doctor" asked the Creator, "What is truth?" It was a sincere question, since Pilate, himself, did not know the truth even though he was a spokesperson for the Emperor of Rome.

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL PREPARATION FOR WAR WITH IRAN
As I have laid out the scenario of how things are done by nations and political leaders, I now want to show who is doing the psychological preparation for a future war with Iran.

It is important for you to remember that when the United States and England, along with some other nations, invaded Iraq and removed Saddam Hussein from power, the people in Europe were angry and resented the reason given for this invasion. Al Qaeda propaganda together with the so-called "peace movement" in the United States have been able to sway millions of Americans from supporting the war in Iraq. The Democratic Party has also played a heavy role in this propaganda war since they tried to use the Iraq war issue to win the last presidential election.

A war with Iran at this point and time in history would lead to a public relations disaster and put the Bush administration in the same predicament that President Lyndon B. Johnson experienced with the Vietnam War. Since the political and military leaders of Israel feel a need to go to war with Iran, but cannot do this unless they have the backing of the NATO nations in Europe and the United States, the people living in these nations must have their thinking changed, so that they will welcome a war with Iran.

If the Islamic nations could be stirred up so that they do great harm to Christians and start to burn Western Embassies, including businesses and government buildings, it would create hatred for the Muslims. The hate could then be hyped up to a level that people would demand that the Muslims be stopped, a war in the Middle East toward a nation with a radical Islamic government would be welcomed by the Europeans and the Americans.

 In the month of February, 2006, I discussed this issue over the telephone with Juri Lina, of Stockholm, Sweden, the author of the book "Architects of Deception." He agreed with my assessment and told me that a number of people in Europe had come to the same conclusion.

THE ISLAMIC GOVERNMENTS ARE NOT STUPID
Even if the leaders in all the Islamic nations dislike Europeans and Americans they are pragmatic and know, that in order for the Muslim world to be able to function, they have to work with the West and be an integrated part of the Global economy. Their oil is of no value to them, unless they can sell it to the West and in return buy the goods needed for their own national consumption.

The Islamic leadership also knows that they do not have the military capacity to go to war with the West. Only radical Islamic governments are willing to risk national suicide. The Taliban in Afghanistan tried it and in a short time American troops were on their soil and cleaned them out. The current Iranian government took notice, and realized that unless they possessed nuclear weapons, they could scream all they wanted and the world would not care.

Therefore, the leadership in Israel had to come up with a plan which would rile the Muslim masses in such a way that their own governments could not stop them. Everybody knows that a hardcore Muslim will go into a rage if someone makes fun of, or depicts the prophet Mohammed in a negative light. The decision was made to degrade and smear the prophet Mohammed in public. The weapon of choice CARTOONS! The man chosen to execute this order was an American Jew by the name of Daniel Pipes.

THE WORLD GOVERNMENT
Once the secret leadership of the World Government had made the decision that Iran was to be attacked, the political preparation and execution was given over to the Bilderberger group. No military action could be taken until the masses of people had been prepared and programmed according to the plan.

The military preparation was given to the armed forces of Israel who would strike Iran. If there would be a military response from the Iranians and other Islamic states, it would be dealt with by forces from the United States and England. The world government leadership knows that the British Parliament and the U.S. congress would balk on an aggressive military action against Iran. Hence, Israel would be used as the trigger which would force England and the United States to enter the conflict, regardless if they liked it or not.                           

THE BILDERBERGERS
This organization dates back to 1954, when a group selected by the World Government met for the first time in hotel Bilderberg, Holland. The leadership in this group is for the most part American Jews, the most well known are Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller. Invited to the meetings are national leaders like government ministers, business leaders, top journalists and educators. These influential leaders from a number of nations in the West meet annually and are given briefings for the plans of the next twelve months.

 

Richard Perle

 
 

Michael Ledeen

 

Wherever there is a Bilderberger conference, an entire hotel with surrounding areas is cleared out of all other guests and media personnel. Even though this is not an official government group; security is furnished by the host nation consisting of military guards, policemen and intelligence personnel. High ranking people are flown in on private jets and given police escort to the hotel. There is never any television, radio or newspaper coverage in the host nation; journalists know that if they want to keep their jobs, they ask no questions, write or say anything.

 
 

Jaap Hoop de Scheffer

 
 

Ziad Abu Amr

The 2005 Bilderberger meeting was held May 5 through 8 at the Dorint Sofitel Seehotel in Rottach Egen, on the shores of the Tegernsee lake in the German federal state of Bavaria. There were a total of 120 delegates from different nations. Leading the conference were David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger. Richard Perle (an American Jew and former head of the Defense Policy Board), Michael Ledeen and William Luti were at the meeting. These three men have been pushing for the need of taking over Iran since the invasion of Iraq. Others in attendance included members from the royal families of Spain, Belgium and Holland. NATO's Secretary General Jaap Hoop de Scheffer attended the meetings, including top management from the Rothschild banking dynasty.

A very interesting delegate was Ziad Abu Amr, a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council; mingling freely with the middle management of the World Government. He is also the President of the Palestinian Council on Foreign Relations and holds the chair as professor of Political Science at Birzeit University located some 12 miles north of Jerusalem in the West Bank.

 
 

Anders Eldrup

 
 

Flemming Rose

THE POLITICAL ARSONIST
The World Government issued an order to the Bilderberger leadership to start a grass fire, which could not be traced back to the World Government. It was made to look accidental so when the fire took off, the media would tell the people it was a random occurance. In attendance at the Bilderberger conference for the fifth time was the Danish businessman, Anders Eldrup, chairman of the Danish corporation Danish Oil & Natural Gas (DONG). Anders is married to a woman by the name of Merete, who is the managing director of JP/Politikens Hus (Jyllands Posten/Political House), which is the publishing company which owns the newspaper, Jyllands Posten. It is noteworthy to mention that this daily paper is not published in Copenhagen, but is a regional paper serving the largest land mass of Denmark, the peninsula which is bordering in the south with Germany.

Since Eldrup's wife was in charge of a local newspaper, it was convenient for her to give this assignment to the cultural editor of the paper, whose name is Flemming Rose (We have been unable to find out if he is a Danish Jew). In 2004 Flemming had traveled to the United States and spent some time with Daniel Pipes. Until this time in my life, I had never heard of Daniel Pipes and did not know that he was a major player in the World government. In order for the reader to better understand, here is a short biography on Daniel Pipes.

Daniel Pipes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Daniel Pipes is an American neoconservative columnist, author, counter terrorism analyst, and scholar of Middle Eastern history. The author or co author of 18 books, which have been translated into 19 languages, Pipes is both praised and criticized for his outspoken views on Islam and Islamism.

Pipes is the founder and director of the Middle East Forum, a former member of the presidentially appointed board of the U.S. Institute of Peace, and a regular columnist for the New York Sun and The Jerusalem Post. He contributes regularly to David Horowitz's online publication FrontPageMag.com, and has had his work published by many newspapers across North America, including the Washington Post, New York Times, and Wall Street Journal.

He is frequently invited to discuss the Middle East on American network television, as well as by universities and think tanks, has appeared on the BBC and Al Jazeera, and has lectured in 25 countries.

His website ranks in the top 16000 most viewed websites on the internet and is translated in 27 languages.

Background
Pipes was born on September 9, 1949, in Boston, Massachusetts, the son of Harvard historian Richard Pipes and his wife Irene (née Roth). Both Pipes' parents were from well off, assimilated Polish Jewish families that escaped from Poland in 1939. The couple met in the United States in 1944, and married two years later. Daniel was their first child.

Pipes attended the Harvard pre school, then received a private school education, partly abroad. He enrolled in Harvard University in the fall of 1968; for his first two years he studied mathematics, but has stated: "I wasn't smart enough. So I chose to become an historian." He credits visits to the Sahara Desert in 1968 and the Sinai Desert in 1969 for piquing his interest in Arabic, and for the following two years he studied in the Middle East. Pipes obtained a B.A. in history in 1971; his senior thesis was titled, A Medieval Islamic Debate: The World Created in Eternity, a study of Al Ghazali, one of the greatest jurists, theologians and mystical thinkers in the Islamic tradition.

He returned to Harvard in 1973 and obtained a Ph.D. in medieval Islamic history in 1978. His Ph.D. dissertation eventually became his first book, Slave Soldiers and Islam, in 1981. He studied abroad for six years, three of which were spent in Egypt, where he wrote a book on colloquial Egyptian Arabic which was published in 1983. He speaks French and English and can read Arabic and German. He taught world history at the University of Chicago from 1972 to 1982, history at Harvard from 1983 to 1984, and policy strategy at the Naval War College from 1984 to 1986.

Pipes has served in various capacities at the Departments of State and Defense, and has testified to the United States Congress. He has been awarded honorary doctorates from universities in Switzerland and the United States.

He has been married twice, and has three daughters.

STRONG STATEMENTS BY DANIEL PIPES
In a speech to the American Jewish Congress on October 21, 2001, Daniel Pipes made the following statement: "I worry very much from the Jewish point of view that the presence, and increased stature and affluence, and enfranchisement of American Muslims... will present true dangers to the American Jews."

In the Jerusalem Post, Janaury 22, 2004, Daniel Pipes wrote an article; here is an excerpt from it: "There is no escaping the unfortunate fact that Muslim government employees in law enforcement, the military, and the diplomatic corps need to be watched for connections to terrorism, as do Muslim chaplains in prisons and the armed forces. Muslim visitors and immigrants must undergo additional background checks. Mosques require a scrutiny beyond that applied to churches, synagogues and temples. Muslim schools require increased oversight to ascertain what is being taught to children..."

FLEMMING RETURNS TO DENMARK AFTER VISIT WITH DANIEL PIPES
When Flemming came back to Denmark, he wrote a strong article on, "The Threat of Islamism," using Pipes as his primary source. The article was published on October 29, 2004 in Jyllands Posten. Pipes has for some time been advocating the need of rounding up American Muslims and holding them in concentration camps, similar to what happened to the American Japanese population during World War II, when both men, women and children were arrested and sent to prison camps, guarded by the U.S. Army.

There is no doubt that Flemming does not like Muslims and when he received the assignment to antagonize them, he came up with the following scheme in order to cover his tracks. He called for a contest from 40 Danish newspaper cartoonists to draw the prophet Mohammed as they depicted him. He would then publish these cartoons to test “freedom of speech” in Denmark. Flemming claims that he received 12 drawings from different cartoonists and on September 30, 2005, the cartoons were published four months after the orders had been given at the Bilderberger meetings. Here is a brief chronology of what happened next.

October 9,2005: Spokesmen for Denmark's Islamic Faith Community demanded an apology from Jyllands Posten.

October 12,2005: Eleven ambassadors from Muslim countries request a meeting with Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen to discuss government action against Jyllands Posten. The Danish government refuses to meet with the Muslim ambassadors and responds with a terse letter that the Danish government does not control the media in Denmark.

October 14, 2005: Muslims demonstrate in Copenhagen.

November December, 2005: A group of Danish Muslim imams (clergy) travel to the Middle East to conduct meetings with religious leaders. They bring with them highly offensive drawings that have not been printed in Jyllands Posten. With the intent to inflame the situation and stir up Muslims in as many nations as possible.

During 2005, the Muhammad cartoons controversy received only minor media attention outside Denmark. Six of the cartoons were reprinted by the Egyptian newspaper El Fagr on October 17, 2005, along with an article strongly denouncing them. The controversy started to spread more during the month of January 2006, when major European newspapers in Holland, Germany, Norway, Belgium and France reprinted the cartoons. The anger among Muslim masses began to boil as some of the cartoons were printed in newspapers in Jordan, Yemen, Malaysia and Algeria.

The media in England and the United States decided not to show any of the cartoons, showing the strong central control that exists over television and the printed media in these two nations. Only the Cardiff University student paper, Gair Rhydd, reprinted the cartoons on February 4, 2006. The day after the publication, the order was given to destroy the entire edition and only 200 copies survived and were distributed. The editor and two journalists were suspended for the decision to publish the cartoons.

CONTINUED: Israel's Future War with Iran...
Page 1 | 2