I want to use this newsletter to share some insights concerning disturbing
events which are beginning to fill our television screens and are getting
more and more attention in our newspapers.
I am sure that all of you have noticed the anger and hate boiling from
Muslims around the world over some cartoons printed in newspapers in Europe.
Only a few American newspapers have reproduced the cartoons; instead the
different news directors have discussed what they look like, but without
Neither has the American media told us what kind of European newspapers
published the cartoons, following the lead of a newspaper in Denmark. It is
obvious that something bigger than normal is happening in the world, and
what I believe is coming down the pipe line is not very good and will affect
the entire population of the world.
THE WAR DRUMS ARE GETTING LOUDER
On March 5, 2006 the United States issued the strongest warning yet to the
government of Iran, when the United States Ambassador to the UN spoke at the
powerful Israeli lobby group AIPAC. Here is a quote from the meeting, which
was printed in the Seattle Post Intelligencer:
By FOSTER KLUG
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER
WASHINGTON The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations on
Sunday told an influential pro Israel lobbying group there is an urgent
need to confront Iran's "clear and unrelenting drive" for a nuclear
John Bolton, speaking before a crowd of 4,500 gathered
for an American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference, said that a
failure by the U.N. Security Council to address Iran would "do lasting
damage to the credibility of the council."
"The longer we wait to confront the threat Iran poses,
the harder and more intractable it will become to solve," Bolton said. At
issue is Iran's ability to enrich uranium to the point it could be used
for a nuclear weapon. Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and
only meant to generate power. Many in the West, however, fear Iran is
aiming to develop atomic weapons.
The International Atomic Energy Agency will meet in
Vienna, Austria, on Monday to discuss Iran's nuclear program and its
compliance with an IAEA demand that it renounce uranium enrichment. The
U.N. agency's board of governors may at that time send the file to the
Security Council for further action.
Iranian officials were in Moscow last week, negotiating
an offer by Russia to enrich uranium for Iran to be used for energy. The
spent fuel would be returned to Russia, easing fears that Iran could use
it for weapons.
Bolton said the Russian proposal lets Iran "reap the
benefits of civil nuclear power while addressing concerns that they are
really pursuing nuclear weapons."
But he said Iran has been engaging in "doublespeak"
during these negotiations by saying with one voice it welcomes discussion,
but with the other "flatly refusing" to give up access to technology and
material to eventually develop nuclear weapons.
Iran "must be made aware that if it continues down the
path of international isolation, there will be tangible and painful
consequences," Bolton said.
John Bolton is a strong American Zionist and you need to remember
that when President Bush tried to nominate Bolton to be the next American
ambassador to the UN, there was so much resistance in the Senate that
President Bush withdrew the nomination and appointed Bolton on a temporary
basis as the American ambassador to the UN.
Bolton did not speak without notes and his speech had been prepared by the
White House staff. Bolton declared the official policy of the Bush
administration which was to send a strong message to Israel that the United
States is committed to war over the issue of the Iranian nuclear program.
Secondly, it was a warning to the Iranian government, "Remember Iraq,
conform to US policy or be prepared for war."
NOTE: Before you read further in this newsletter, you might
want to read my newsletter of May 2004, when I laid out the scenario of
Israel, France and England making a joint attack on Egypt, with all the
deception prior to the beginning of this war of 1956. What took place in
1956 is now repeated, the only difference is the target for this new war and
a different lineup of the attackers.
ISRAEL'S FUTURE ATTACK ON IRAN
The nation of Israel is now standing at a crossroad. It was
founded on deception, broken promises and violence as it came into existence
in 1948. The Jewish people forced themselves into the land of Palestine and
through brute military power carved out the state of Israel on the back of
the Palestinian people, who lived in the land. In a number of wars, 1956,
1967, 1973 and the invasion of Lebanon in 1982, the Israeli military forces
were able to not only defeat the armies of Egypt, Syria and Jordan, but to
smash their military power so that any future military attacks from these
would be impossible. In all these wars, Israel relied on conventional
weapons and the immense military backup from the United States.
From the beginning in 1948, the political leadership of Israel made a
decision to develop nuclear weapons and the technological capacity to do
this was either stolen from the United States through the Israeli
intelligence service (the Mossad), or given by American Jews working for the
United States Atomic program. The Israeli nuclear weapon program was
developed in a military complex in the Negev desert and named Dimona
research center. Currently the Israeli government has some 200 nuclear
bombs, with some of them placed in missiles on Israeli submarines. When
Saddam Hussein began to develop nuclear weapon capacity and a joint French
Soviet nuclear reactor had been built in Iraq, the Israelis took no chances
and in 1981 sent fighter bombers to take out the reactor.
With an Islamic population in the hundreds of millions versus the small
population of Israel of only 6.5 million, Israel must remain militarily
superior in order to survive. Thus the political leadership in Israel cannot
tolerate that a Middle Eastern country might acquire nuclear weapons. With
Iran being extremely belligerent toward Israel and a current fundamentalist
Islamic government speaking of wiping Israel off the map, war is inevitable.
It is noteworthy to point out that Iran is not an Arab nation, it was known
in ancient times as Persia, and it was an empire before being crushed by
Alexander the Great in 334 B.C.
IRAN HAS A SECRET MILITARY NUCLEAR PROGRAM
(BBC 2 16 2006)
“French Foreign Minister
Philippe Douste Blazy told French TV
Thursday: No civil nuclear program can explain the Iranian nuclear program.
It is a clandestine military nuclear program.’
"The international community has sent a very strong message to the Iranians
show reason, suspend all nuclear activities and uranium enrichment. And
they're not listening to us.
"That is the reason why, for the first time...the international community is
united. It's not just the Europeans France, Germany, and the British it's
also Russia and China."
IRAN AIMS TO DESTROY ISRAEL
(Reported in the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz 2 15 2006)
"’Iran's goal is to eliminate the State of Israel,’ Maj. Gen. Amos
Yadlin, the new head of Military Intelligence, told the Knesset Foreign
Affairs and Defense Committee on Tuesday.
“Yadlin stressed that statements by Iranian President Ahmadinejad about the
need to ‘wipe Israel off the map’ were not mere slips of the tongue, and
should be taken seriously.
“‘Iran is likely to acquire the capability for manufacturing enriched
uranium in industrial quantities within six months to a year,’ Yadlin said.
‘If its nuclear program suffers no disruptions, it will have its first
nuclear bomb in three to four years.’"
It is obvious that some kind of military action is planned against Iran, but
before military actions can take place, the coalition of aggressors must
prepare its citizens by making them believe that a war is good, it is
justified, and it will benefit the people in the world. In times past
attackers have used propaganda to dehumanize the so-called enemy, so the
general population would feel at ease when large numbers of people were
killed. This is the way Adolf Hitler prepared the German people prior to his
attack on the Soviet Union in 1941. In the United States, after Pearl
Harbor, on November 7, 1941, the American news media painted the Japanese
people in a bad light, calling them "Japs." Despite the fact that large
numbers of American-Japanese people had lived in the United States for many
years, they were rounded up and kept in concentration camps during World War
II. The American people felt that this was a proper action to take against
these "yellow beasts" who had attacked the U.S. On the other hand, the large
German-American population was not vilified. Very few German-Americans
showed any sympathy toward Nazi Germany and there were large numbers of
German-Americans in the United States armed forces fighting the Nazis. Very
few Japanese-Americans had sympathy for Japan's war effort, but no one
listened to them. Toward the end of World War II, a number of young American
Japanese were drafted into the U.S. Army and sent into combat in Europe
where they performed superbly, took heavy causalities and proved that they
were loyal Americans.
For thousands of years different political rulers have understood
that to win a war it is not enough to build up an army, equip them and turn
them loose in battle. The minds of people must be persuaded that they want
to actually participate in the war; they are excited
about the war and
willing to die in the war. National pride, patriotic feelings, defending
freedom, democracy, a religious belief are just a few of the causes used by
the people working in psychological warfare. The late Dr. Joseph Goebbels
was well known in the art of persuasion and functioned as Hitler's
propaganda minister. From the early 1930s until the very end of World War
II, his voice was heard on German radio, where he with a passion swayed the
German people to sacrifice themselves on the battle field for Hitler and the
Fatherland. Millions of Germans believed him and fought savagely to the
bitter end. They did not understand that they were manipulated, so they
wasted their lives for a cause that was a lie. There is no nation on the
earth today that does not have a national department of psychological
warfare. In the United States there are different units operating under
Federal control. The foremost "spin doctor" in the United States is the
Press Secretary for the White House. He is a highly paid professional liar
and his job is to make sure that he feeds the "correct version" to the
media, who in turn will brainwash the American people.
The State Department, the Pentagon, the FBI and the CIA all have their own
units staffed by people who are hired to do only one thing, sway the
American people to believe current policies and actions. Misinformation and
lying are the tools used in this trade of deception. Here is an excerpt from
a publication by the US Army, to show that these units exist:
“Propaganda Media" is based upon "Psychological
Operations Field Manual No.33-1" published in August 1979 by Department of
the Army Headquarters in Washington DC; and "Psychological Operations (PSYOP)
Media Subcourse PO 0816" by The Army Institute for Professional
Development, published in 1983.
“Propaganda Media are categorized by methods of
dissemination: face to face (interpersonal), audiovisual, audio, and
“Face to face (interpersonal) communication is
the most effective means of transmitting a persuasive message. It is
employed in rallies, rumor campaigns, group discussions, lectures, show
and tell demonstrations, social organizations, social activities,
entertainment, and individual person to person contact, all providing a
participating experience for the individual or group to recall later.
“Audiovisual media such as television,
electronic tape recordings, and sound motion pictures are the second most
effective means of communication available to the psychological operator.
Effectiveness is based on seeing and hearing the persuasive message. These
media are an excellent means of transmitting persuasive messages and
eliciting a high degree of recall.
“Audio media (loudspeakers and radio) lend
themselves to the transmission of brief, simple messages and to
personalization by use of the human voice. They require little or no
effort by the audience, and generally, they have more appeal than visual
media. Also, the barrier of illiteracy may be more easily overcome with
audio media than with visual media (printed material).
“Visual media can transmit long, complex
material. Animated or still cartoons may be used to convey themes to
illiterate and preliterate target audiences. Visual media generally have
the least amount of popular appeal.
“Themes are reinforced and the target audience given
broad coverage by using several media to deliver the same basic message.
For example, radio and television can augment leaflets; face to face
communication can support newspaper circulation.”
Osama bin Laden's organization has an efficient operating propaganda
department that is releasing audio and video recordings on a regular basis
for the purpose of rallying their followers and putting fear into the people
in Europe and North America.
Not only do governments have professional propaganda departments, there are
political parties, business and industrial corporations, think tanks, etc.,
which also rely heavily on propaganda. It is named "information" or
“advertisement” to make the public accept it more readily. Even false
religions like Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses, Scientology, Hinduism, Islam
and many more, are working hard to convert people to their religious
God's Word, as found in the King James Bible, is the opposite of all
propaganda; it is presenting eternal truth, which will last forever. Here is
what Jesus said: And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make
you free. John 8:32
Jesus spoke these words to the people who rejected him as the Son of God:
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.
He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because
there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own:
for he is a liar, and the father of it. John 8:44
When Pontius Pilate, the governor, encountered the Son of God, the following
Then Pilate entered into the judgment hall again, and called Jesus, and
said unto him, Art thou the King of the Jews? Jesus answered him, Sayest
thou this thing of thyself, or did others tell it thee of me? Pilate
answered, Am I a Jew? Thine own nation and the chief priests have delivered
thee unto me: what hast thou done? Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this
world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that
I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou
sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I
into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is
of the truth heareth my voice. Pilate saith unto him, What is truth? And
when he had said this, he went out again unto the Jews, and saith unto them,
I find in him no fault at all. John 18:33 38
Pilate was a politician representing the Empire of Rome. As a Roman
governor, his job was not only to keep the population in Palestine under
control, but also to indoctrinate them to believe the political directives
from Rome. Thus this human "spin doctor" asked the Creator, "What is truth?"
It was a sincere question, since Pilate, himself, did not know the truth
even though he was a spokesperson for the Emperor of Rome.
THE PSYCHOLOGICAL PREPARATION FOR WAR WITH IRAN
As I have laid out the scenario of how things are done by nations and
political leaders, I now want to show who is doing the psychological
preparation for a future war with Iran.
It is important for you to remember that when the United States and England,
along with some other nations, invaded Iraq and removed Saddam Hussein from
power, the people in Europe were angry and resented the reason given for
this invasion. Al Qaeda propaganda together with the so-called "peace
movement" in the United States have been able to sway millions of Americans
from supporting the war in Iraq. The Democratic Party has also played a
heavy role in this propaganda war since they tried to use the Iraq war issue
to win the last presidential election.
A war with Iran at this point and time in history would lead to a public
relations disaster and put the Bush administration in the same predicament
that President Lyndon B. Johnson experienced with the Vietnam War. Since the
political and military leaders of Israel feel a need to go to war with Iran,
but cannot do this unless they have the backing of the NATO nations in
Europe and the United States, the people living in these nations must have
their thinking changed, so that they will welcome a war with Iran.
If the Islamic nations could be stirred up so that they do great harm to
Christians and start to burn Western Embassies, including businesses and
government buildings, it would create hatred for the Muslims. The hate could
then be hyped up to a level that people would demand that the Muslims be
stopped, a war in the Middle East toward a nation with a radical
Islamic government would be welcomed by the Europeans and the Americans.
In the month of February, 2006, I discussed this issue over the telephone
with Juri Lina, of Stockholm, Sweden, the author of the book "Architects of
Deception." He agreed with my assessment and told me that a number of people
in Europe had come to the same conclusion.
THE ISLAMIC GOVERNMENTS ARE NOT STUPID
Even if the leaders in all the Islamic nations dislike Europeans and
Americans they are pragmatic and know, that in order for the Muslim world to
be able to function, they have to work with the West and be an integrated
part of the Global economy. Their oil is of no value to them, unless they
can sell it to the West and in return buy the goods needed for their own
The Islamic leadership also knows that they do not have the military
capacity to go to war with the West. Only radical Islamic governments are
willing to risk national suicide. The Taliban in Afghanistan tried it and in
a short time American troops were on their soil and cleaned them out. The
current Iranian government took notice, and realized that unless they
possessed nuclear weapons, they could scream all they wanted and the world
would not care.
Therefore, the leadership in Israel had to come up with a plan which would
rile the Muslim masses in such a way that their own governments could not
stop them. Everybody knows that a hardcore Muslim will go into a rage if
someone makes fun of, or depicts the prophet Mohammed in a negative light.
The decision was made to degrade and smear the prophet Mohammed in public.
The weapon of choice CARTOONS! The man chosen to execute this order was an
American Jew by the name of Daniel Pipes.
THE WORLD GOVERNMENT
Once the secret leadership of the World Government had made the decision
that Iran was to be attacked, the political preparation and execution was
given over to the Bilderberger group. No military action could be taken
until the masses of people had been prepared and programmed according to the
The military preparation was given to the armed forces of Israel who would
strike Iran. If there would be a military response from the Iranians and
other Islamic states, it would be dealt with by forces from the United
States and England. The world government leadership knows that the British
Parliament and the U.S. congress would balk on an aggressive military action
against Iran. Hence, Israel would be used as the trigger which would force
England and the United States to enter the conflict, regardless if they
liked it or not.
This organization dates back to 1954, when a group selected by the World
Government met for the first time in hotel Bilderberg, Holland. The
leadership in this group is for the most part American Jews, the most well
known are Henry Kissinger and
David Rockefeller. Invited to the meetings are
national leaders like government ministers, business leaders, top
journalists and educators. These influential leaders from a number of
nations in the West meet annually and are given briefings for the plans of
the next twelve months.
Wherever there is a Bilderberger conference, an entire hotel with
surrounding areas is cleared out of all other guests and media personnel.
Even though this is not an official government group; security is furnished
by the host nation consisting of military guards, policemen and intelligence
personnel. High ranking people are flown in on private jets and given police
escort to the hotel. There is never any television, radio or newspaper
coverage in the host nation; journalists know that if they want to keep
their jobs, they ask no questions, write or say anything.
Jaap Hoop de Scheffer
Ziad Abu Amr
The 2005 Bilderberger meeting was held May 5 through 8 at the Dorint Sofitel
Seehotel in Rottach Egen, on the shores of the Tegernsee lake in the German
federal state of Bavaria. There were a total of 120 delegates from different
nations. Leading the conference were David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger.
Richard Perle (an American Jew and former head of the Defense Policy Board),
Michael Ledeen and William Luti were at the meeting. These three men have
been pushing for the need of taking over Iran since the invasion of Iraq.
Others in attendance included members from the royal families of Spain,
Belgium and Holland. NATO's Secretary General Jaap Hoop de Scheffer attended
the meetings, including top management from the Rothschild banking dynasty.
A very interesting delegate was Ziad Abu Amr, a member of the Palestinian
Legislative Council; mingling freely with the middle management of the World
Government. He is also the President of the Palestinian Council on Foreign
Relations and holds the chair as professor of Political Science at Birzeit
University located some 12 miles north of Jerusalem in the West Bank.
THE POLITICAL ARSONIST
The World Government issued an order to the Bilderberger leadership to start
a grass fire, which could not be traced back to the World Government. It was
made to look accidental so when the fire took off, the media would tell the
people it was a random occurance. In attendance at the Bilderberger
conference for the fifth time was the Danish businessman, Anders Eldrup,
chairman of the Danish corporation Danish Oil & Natural Gas (DONG). Anders
is married to a woman by the name of Merete, who is the managing director of
JP/Politikens Hus (Jyllands Posten/Political House), which is the publishing
company which owns the newspaper, Jyllands Posten. It is noteworthy to
mention that this daily paper is not published in Copenhagen, but is a
regional paper serving the largest land mass of Denmark, the peninsula which
is bordering in the south with Germany.
Since Eldrup's wife was in charge of a local newspaper, it was convenient
for her to give this assignment to the cultural editor of the paper, whose
name is Flemming Rose (We have been unable to find out if he is a Danish
Jew). In 2004 Flemming had traveled to the United States and spent some time
with Daniel Pipes. Until this time in my life, I had never heard of Daniel
Pipes and did not know that he was a major player in the World government.
In order for the reader to better understand, here is a short biography on
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Daniel Pipes is an American neoconservative columnist, author, counter
terrorism analyst, and scholar of Middle Eastern history. The author or co
author of 18 books, which have been translated into 19 languages, Pipes is
both praised and criticized for his outspoken views on Islam and Islamism.
Pipes is the founder and director of the Middle East
Forum, a former member of the presidentially appointed board of the U.S.
Institute of Peace, and a regular columnist for the New York Sun and The
Jerusalem Post. He contributes regularly to David Horowitz's online
publication FrontPageMag.com, and has had his work published by many
newspapers across North America, including the Washington Post, New York
Times, and Wall Street Journal.
He is frequently invited to discuss the Middle East on
American network television, as well as by universities and think tanks,
has appeared on the BBC and Al Jazeera, and has lectured in 25 countries.
His website ranks in the top 16000 most viewed websites
on the internet and is translated in 27 languages.
Pipes was born on September 9, 1949, in Boston, Massachusetts, the son of
Harvard historian Richard Pipes and his wife Irene (née Roth). Both Pipes'
parents were from well off, assimilated Polish Jewish families that
escaped from Poland in 1939. The couple met in the United States in 1944,
and married two years later. Daniel was their first child.
Pipes attended the Harvard pre school, then received a
private school education, partly abroad. He enrolled in Harvard University
in the fall of 1968; for his first two years he studied mathematics, but
has stated: "I wasn't smart enough. So I chose to become an historian." He
credits visits to the Sahara Desert in 1968 and the Sinai Desert in 1969
for piquing his interest in Arabic, and for the following two years he
studied in the Middle East. Pipes obtained a B.A. in history in 1971; his
senior thesis was titled, A Medieval Islamic Debate: The World Created in
Eternity, a study of Al Ghazali, one of the greatest jurists, theologians
and mystical thinkers in the Islamic tradition.
He returned to Harvard in 1973 and obtained a Ph.D. in
medieval Islamic history in 1978. His Ph.D. dissertation eventually became
his first book, Slave Soldiers and Islam, in 1981. He studied abroad for
six years, three of which were spent in Egypt, where he wrote a book on
colloquial Egyptian Arabic which was published in 1983. He speaks French
and English and can read Arabic and German. He taught world history at the
University of Chicago from 1972 to 1982, history at Harvard from 1983 to
1984, and policy strategy at the Naval War College from 1984 to 1986.
Pipes has served in various capacities at the
Departments of State and Defense, and has testified to the United States
Congress. He has been awarded honorary doctorates from universities in
Switzerland and the United States.
He has been married twice, and has three daughters.
STRONG STATEMENTS BY DANIEL PIPES
In a speech to the American Jewish Congress on October 21, 2001, Daniel
Pipes made the following statement: "I worry very much from the Jewish point
of view that the presence, and increased stature and affluence, and
enfranchisement of American Muslims... will present true dangers to the
In the Jerusalem Post, Janaury 22, 2004, Daniel Pipes wrote an article; here
is an excerpt from it: "There is no escaping the unfortunate fact that
Muslim government employees in law enforcement, the military, and the
diplomatic corps need to be watched for connections to terrorism, as do
Muslim chaplains in prisons and the armed forces. Muslim visitors and
immigrants must undergo additional background checks. Mosques require a
scrutiny beyond that applied to churches, synagogues and temples. Muslim
schools require increased oversight to ascertain what is being taught to
FLEMMING RETURNS TO DENMARK AFTER VISIT WITH DANIEL PIPES
When Flemming came back to Denmark, he wrote a strong article on, "The
Threat of Islamism," using Pipes as his primary source. The article was
published on October 29, 2004 in Jyllands Posten. Pipes has for some time
been advocating the need of rounding up American Muslims and holding them in
concentration camps, similar to what happened to the American Japanese
population during World War II, when both men, women and children were
arrested and sent to prison camps, guarded by the U.S. Army.
There is no doubt that Flemming does not like Muslims and when he received
the assignment to antagonize them, he came up with the following scheme in
order to cover his tracks. He called for a contest from 40 Danish newspaper
cartoonists to draw the prophet Mohammed as they depicted him. He would then
publish these cartoons to test “freedom of speech” in Denmark. Flemming
claims that he received 12 drawings from different cartoonists and on
September 30, 2005, the cartoons were published four months after the orders
had been given at the Bilderberger meetings. Here is a brief chronology of
what happened next.
October 9,2005: Spokesmen for Denmark's Islamic Faith Community
demanded an apology from Jyllands Posten.
October 12,2005: Eleven ambassadors from Muslim countries request a
meeting with Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen to discuss
government action against Jyllands Posten. The Danish government refuses to
meet with the Muslim ambassadors and responds with a terse letter that the
Danish government does not control the media in Denmark.
October 14, 2005: Muslims demonstrate in Copenhagen.
November December, 2005: A group of Danish Muslim imams (clergy)
travel to the Middle East to conduct meetings with religious leaders. They
bring with them highly offensive drawings that have not been printed in
Jyllands Posten. With the intent to inflame the situation and stir up
Muslims in as many nations as possible.
During 2005, the Muhammad cartoons controversy received only minor media
attention outside Denmark. Six of the cartoons were reprinted by the
Egyptian newspaper El Fagr on October 17, 2005, along with an article
strongly denouncing them. The controversy started to spread more during the
month of January 2006, when major European newspapers in Holland, Germany,
Norway, Belgium and France reprinted the cartoons. The anger among Muslim
masses began to boil as some of the cartoons were printed in newspapers in
Jordan, Yemen, Malaysia and Algeria.
The media in England and the United States decided not to show any of the
cartoons, showing the strong central control that exists over television and
the printed media in these two nations. Only the Cardiff University student
paper, Gair Rhydd, reprinted the cartoons on February 4, 2006. The day after
the publication, the order was given to destroy the entire edition and only
200 copies survived and were distributed. The editor and two journalists
were suspended for the decision to publish the cartoons.
CONTINUED: Israel's Future War with Iran...
Page 1 | 2