Tattoos and the Bible's Authority
We received the following email on the subject of the Tattoos and the
Bible’s authority. It is especially relevant since the views expressed by
this person are representative of the many young people in the world today
and how they view tattoos in the light of Scripture.
Hello. I hope someone actually reads this.
My comment is about your articles on tattooing, and what's written
in Leviticus 19:28. My boyfriend wanted to get a tattoo, and I was
doing some research on the subject when I came across this. I'd
like to state that I am Christian, and very devoted to my faith, but
I found myself questioning the truth in this article. I found
another oppinion, from an historian who writes for National
Geographic. Given, this writer may not be Christian, but he seems
to have his historical facts down.
This was from About.com:
“A true translation of Leviticus 19:28 could never have mentioned
the word "tattoo". Tattoo is a Polynesian word that entered the
English language after the voyages of Capt. Cook to Tahiti in the
18th century, which is when tattooing became popular again in the
West.
I have done a great deal of research into this subject as the
host, writer and producer of a documentary series, The Vanishing
Tattoo, on tattooing for National Geographic.
It is widely accepted among Biblical scholars that Leviticus
19:28 referred solely to the practise of people cutting themselves
and rubbing in ash when in a period of mourning. The ash rubbed into
wounds left permanent marks, the marks referred to in Leviticus
19:28."
Isn't this what they mean by "for the dead"? So, "for the dead"
wouldn't actually apply to tattoos as we know them today.
Please don't think I'm one of those people "running miles" to go
around the Word of God. I honestly would just like to know your
take on this. I'd love it if you would get back to me.
Thank you for your time!
-Anonymous |
The Response:
Hi Anonymous,
Since you indicated
that you would like an honest answer, rather than just trying to give you
a quick answer, I have taken the time to answer your concerns. I want you
to know that I am not attacking you; my words may seem harsh, but that is
not my intention, since I am responding to you in love by giving you the
truth. In this day and age with internet, there is an abundance of
knowledge, but a scarcity for real truth. The truth is always the truth
and it is not always what we want to hear, but what follows hereafter is
the truth because it comes straight from the Bible. I say this because I
believe in the Bible; I believe that it is an absolute truth that has not
changed from the time God inspired men to write down His words until now
when I hold it in my hands. God himself has promised to preserve His words
forever, not just the general meaning or story, but word for word.
Psalms 12:6-7
6.
The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace
of earth, purified seven times.
7.
Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this
generation for ever.
The tattoo article
which you are questioning, To Tattoo or Not
To Tattoo is documented extensively with much source material
coming from secular publications but also using scripture as well. What I
find disturbing though is that you doubt the truth brought out by the
Bible? Why would you doubt the authority of the Bible? As such, before I
can answer your questions, I feel that I need to establish the authority
of the Bible.
You see, God knew that
when men sat and wrote down His inspired words on paper, the original
copies would not and could not exist forever; furthermore, it was not His
intention that the original should exist forever but only that the text
from the original would be preserved forever. This is all important
because that is the main difference between the King James Bible and all
the other versions which say that they are God’s Word. In both instances,
you and I are faced with a written language that we cannot read and
therefore are in need of a translator.
The translators of the
King James Bible did their best to translate the words as directly as
possible, leaving it up to you and me to read the text carefully, at times
having to study history in order to learn the cultural background before
fully understanding the text. The King James text has simply been rendered
in our language, and we have the confidence of knowing that we do not have
to trust another man's understanding or theology, but can make up our
minds as to what God is trying to tell us in a particular passage of
scripture. In the English language, the King James Bible is the only Bible
available that has been translated using this approach called formal
equivalency.
The translators of the
other Bible versions chose to only use 44 of the 5,366 manuscripts that
are available, and the 44 – all of which are from Alexandria – contradict
each other. This is in stark contrast to the other 5,322 manuscripts from
Antioch that the King James Bible is based upon, and unlike the
Alexandrian manuscripts, all the manuscripts from Antioch agree with each
other. So here are these modern translators working with manuscripts that
oppose each other, and then another problem surfaces. Unlike the King
James translators who used formal equivalency, these modern translators
are using a method called dynamic equivalency. This is how it works: when
a passage of scripture seems difficult to understand, the modern
translator will change it in order to make it easier for you to
understand. You will never know for sure what God said since you must
trust the translator's theology and knowledge of the scripture to lead you
into truth. The translator is acting as a teacher, not just telling you
what God said, but adding his understanding of what God meant!
The translator/teacher
is just a man, and can make mistakes. Since the Bible is the source for
all truth (i.e. Plan of Salvation), it's vital to know exactly what God
has said! If the Bible in your hand doesn't give you God's Word, but a
teacher's explanation of God's intent, what can you do? What is the final
authority? There is no authority you can trust. This is just one of the
reasons why the King James Bible is the superior English translation in
the world today, it uses formal equivalency. The translators were
determined not to tell you God's intent, but just convey to you His words!
That is the difference between a translator and a teacher; it is the
translator's job to tell you what God said and it is the teacher's job to
tell you how to understand and apply it to your life. That is why I always
insist on a Bible that will give me the purity of God's Word, so that I
have an absolute upon which to judge everything else.
Now
there are many Christians today that will say that we cannot even trust
the King James Bible since it was not translated from the original
manuscripts but from copies of copies and so on. The Bible will alleviate
any reservations you might have about this, as brought out by Samuel Gipp
in The Answer Book.
QUESTION:
Shouldn't we be loyal to the "original autographs" and not a mere
translation?
ANSWER: We
should put as much value on the "originals" as God does.
EXPLANATION:
It is impossible to be true to the originals because the originals
have long been lost. This well established fact should be
enough to make the sincere student of Scripture realize that an
affirmative answer to the question is an impossibility.
But it does not
explain the above answer. Just how much value does God put on
the originals?
To get the answer
we must explore several chapters in the book of Jeremiah beginning
with the famous passage in chapter 36 concerning the roll that
Jeremiah had written.
In verse 21 the
roll is brought before King Jehoiakim and read by his servant Jehudi.
According to
verse 23 Jehudi read three or four leaves and King Jehoiakim cut it
up with a penknife and cast it into the fire on the hearth until it
was destroyed.
Thus ends
ORIGINAL #1!
Then the Lord
moved Jeremiah to rewrite the roll adding some words to it.
(Jeremiah 36:32)
Thus ORIGINAL #2
is born.
We are shown the
text of this second original in Jeremiah 45-51 where it is
reproduced for our benefit.
Jeremiah told
Seraiah to read this roll when he came into Babylon. (Jeremiah
51:59-61) Then Jeremiah instructed Seraiah, after he finished
reading the roll, to bind a stone to it and cast it into the
Euphrates river (Jeremiah 51:63)!
Thus ends
ORIGINAL #2!
But wait! We have
a copy of the text of the roll in chapters 45-51. Where did it come
from? It came from a copy of original #2, which we can only
call ORIGINAL #3!
So there are two
very big problems for those who overemphasize the "originals".
(1) Every Bible
ever printed with a copy of Jeremiah in it has a text in chapters
45-51 which is translated from a copy of the "second" original, or
ORIGINAL #3.
(2) Secondly, NO
ONE can overlook the fact that God didn't have the least bit
of interest in preserving the "original" once it had been
copied and its message delivered. So WHY should we put more of an
emphasis on the originals than God does? An emphasis which is
plainly unscriptural.
Thus, since
we have the text of the "originals" preserved in the King James
Bible we have no need of the originals, even if they were
available. |
As you can see, since
we have the text of the originals preserved in the King James Bible, we
need only to read it in order to find the answer we are seeking regarding
tattoos. The Bible is not just truth, it is real truth, and reveals
exactly what God’s thoughts are regarding tattoos. Since I am confident
that the Bible which I hold in my hand is indeed the Word of God, let’s
look at the scripture in question which deals with tattoos.
Leviticus 19:28
Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead,
nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.
The sentence starts off
with “You shall not” and ends with “print any marks upon you”.
Reading the Bible literally, it seems pretty straightforward but there are
many who will interject, saying that it only applies when you’re doing it
for the dead. With that in mind, let look further into the Bible to see
how we are to treat our body. Since we are the creature and God is our
Creator, what does God expect from us in how we are to treat our bodies?
Let’s read what the apostle Paul had to say on this subject:
1
Corinthians 3:16-17
16.
Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the
Spirit of God dwelleth in you?
17.
If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for
the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.
As Christians, God
considers our bodies to be temples in which the Holy Spirit dwells; He
wants us to be holy and to take care of the body which He has provided for
us. When we choose to smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol, use drugs, have sex
outside of marriage or even tattoo our bodies, it grieves the Holy Spirit
who lives inside of us as it says in verse 16. Paul continues to expound
upon this point as he quotes from Genesis 2:24, saying that if we are
joined to Christ, then what have we to do with sin?
1
Corinthians 6:15-20
15.
Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ?
shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an
harlot? God forbid.
16.
What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body?
for two, saith he, shall be one flesh.
17.
But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit.
18.
Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body;
but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.
19.
What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost
which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?
20.
For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your
body, and in your spirit, which are God's.
We aren’t supposed to
be Christian’s in name only, but also in the way we act. We take our name
from Christ as followers of Him. Therefore, if we are His followers,
shouldn’t we be obedient to His commandments? After all, Jesus is Lord; He
was God in the Old Testament, New Testament, and even now. Since Jesus is
the author of the Bible, and we claim to be followers of Him, shouldn’t we
also be obedient to His commandments too?
John
14:12-17
12.
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works
that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do;
because I go unto my Father.
13.
And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the
Father may be glorified in the Son.
14.
If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.
15.
If ye love me, keep my commandments.
16.
And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another
Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
17.
Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because
it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth
with you, and shall be in you.
Jesus says that when we
worship God, we must do it in “spirit and in truth” because that is
how our heavenly Father wants us to do it.
John
4:23-24
23.
But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall
worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to
worship him.
24.
God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in
spirit and in truth.
So if you reject a
portion of the Bible (truth), how can you worship the Father in “spirit
and in truth,” when in reality, all that you’re doing is
worshiping in “spirit” only? Jesus said that if we loved Him, we
would keep His commandments (John 14:15). Therefore, wouldn’t a true
measure of our love for Him would be how well we keep His commandments?
John
14:21-24
21.
He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that
loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I
will love him, and will manifest myself to him.
22.
Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt
manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?
23.
Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my
words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make
our abode with him.
24.
He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which
ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.
The Bible is a book of
truth that man could not write if he would and would not write if he
could. Towards this one book, he has shown the most intense hatred,
revealing a determination to get rid of such a scathing indictment of his
own depraved condition. The opposition to the Word of God is born of the
fact that the Bible reveals man's sin, discounts his wisdom, makes his
greatest might to seem puny, and lays his pride in the dust. Every engine
of destruction of human wisdom, human science, human philosophy, human
wit, human satire, and human brutality has been brought to bear against
the Bible - and it still stands! The Bible has been under attack by Satan
since he uttered those famous words to Eve, “Yea, hath God said?”
As such, Satan still is making every attempt to destroy the Word of God.
I would like to point
out that only God has the legal right to mark bodies, after all, He is the
legal owner! I am going to show you four other instances in the Bible
where it speaks of marking the body.
q
God set a mark upon Cain so that anyone who saw him would
know not to kill him.
Genesis 4:13-15
13.
And Cain said unto the LORD, My punishment is greater than I can
bear.
14.
Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the
earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a
vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that
findeth me shall slay me.
15.
And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain,
vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon
Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.
q
An angel marked the men in Jerusalem who were to be spared
from the judgment of the Lord.
Ezekiel 9:1-6
1.
He cried also in mine ears with a loud voice, saying, Cause them
that have charge over the city to draw near, even every man with his
destroying weapon in his hand.
2.
And, behold, six men came from the way of the higher gate, which
lieth toward the north, and every man a slaughter weapon in his hand; and
one man among them was clothed with linen, with a writer's inkhorn by his
side: and they went in, and stood beside the brasen altar.
3.
And the glory of the God of Israel was gone up from the cherub,
whereupon he was, to the threshold of the house. And he called to the man
clothed with linen, which had the writer's inkhorn by his side;
4.
And the LORD said unto him, Go through the midst of the city,
through the midst of Jerusalem, and set a mark upon the foreheads of
the men that sigh and that cry for all the abominations that be done
in the midst thereof.
5.
And to the others he said in mine hearing, Go ye after him through
the city, and smite: let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity:
6.
Slay utterly old and young, both maids, and little children, and
women: but come not near any man upon whom is the mark; and begin at
my sanctuary. Then they began at the ancient men which were before the
house.
q
The angels will seal God’s people with a mark in their
foreheads.
Revelation 7:1-4
1.
And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four
corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind
should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.
2.
And I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the seal of
the living God: and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom
it was given to hurt the earth and the sea,
3.
Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we
have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads.
4.
And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were
sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the
children of Israel.
q
In the future, Satan’s man (the antichrist) will impose an
illegal mark of loyalty which will be rejected by God.
Revelation 13:16-18
16.
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and
bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17.
And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark,
or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18.
Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of
the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred
threescore and six.
To tattoo or not tattoo
is not the question, but rather, am I going to be obedient to God’s Word?
Tattoos represent two things, rebellion against God, and conformity to the
masses in the world. God has clearly stated in the Bible that men and
women are not to mutilate the skin of their bodies (Leviticus 19:28).
Demon oppressed Christians are trying to eliminate verse 28 by incorrectly
quoting the verse 27, which says you are not supposed to trim your hair or
beard. Verse 27, correctly applied refers to men and women preparing
themselves for occult rituals, this is not the same as someone merely
getting a haircut or shaving off his beard.
Tattoos and body
piercing are now preparing people for the mark of the Beast; this is what
the Bible has to say about those who take Satan’s mark:
Revelation 14:9-12
9.
And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If
any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his
forehead, or in his hand,
10.
The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is
poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he
shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy
angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
11.
And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever:
and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image,
and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.
12.
Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the
commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.
If you want to say that
tattoos are fine as long as they’re applied with needle and ink versus a
knife and ash, that is simply bad doctrine, in fact it stinks of demonic
influence (1 Timothy 4:1). It really doesn’t matter how the tattoo is
applied, all we need to know that God condemns it in any application. Any
backslidden Christian wanting to get around “You shall not” will
have to make the scripture imply something that was not intended or
invalidate it. The Bible says that we are not mark our bodies for any
reason, not even as a witnessing tool!
Regarding the response
to tattoos that you quoted on about.com, here is what Vince Hemingson had
to say on the subject:
“A true translation of Leviticus 19:28 could never have mentioned the word
"tattoo". Tattoo is a Polynesian word that entered the English language
after the voyages of Capt. Cook to Tahiti in the 18th century. Which is
when tattooing became popular again in the West.
I
have done a great deal of research into this subject as the host, writer
and producer of a documentary series, The Vanishing Tattoo, on tattooing
for National Geographic.
It is widely accepted among Biblical scholars that Leviticus 19:28
referred solely to the practise of people cutting themselves and rubbing
in ash when in a period of mourning. The ash rubbed into wounds left
permanent marks, the marks referred to in Leviticus 19:28.”
https://christianteens.about.com/cs/christianadvice/a/tattooresponse_5.htm
If Hemingson were
indeed as knowledgeable as he claims, he would know that the King James
Bible was finished in the 17th century, specifically in the
year 1611. Hemingson says the word came from the Polynesian language and
was incorporated into the English language in the 18th century.
Do you see a discrepancy here? How can a word, which supposedly derived
its origin from the Polynesian language, be used in an English bible some
one hundred years earlier before the Polynesian language was even
discovered? The answer is quite simple, the Bible manuscripts had it all
along, and the translators did their job in properly translating Leviticus
19:28!
Hemingson summarizes
his defense of tattoos by saying:
“It is widely accepted among Biblical scholars that Leviticus 19:28
referred solely to the practise of people cutting themselves and rubbing
in ash when in a period of mourning.”
It was the custom of
those who served idol gods in ancient times to imprint upon themselves the
mark of an idol to show that they were his servants. It’s not that hard to
understand, the tattoo was a mark of loyalty to the demon god! Where in
the Bible does it command us to do the same? Why would God give His stamp
of approval on tattoos as long as it is not for the dead? This would
completely invalidate the scripture as long as your motive is pure, since
you’re not doing it “in a period of mourning?” That logic
contradicts many other scripture passages! Given all that has been
previously said, the answer must be a resounding NO!
In the Gospel of John,
Jesus says that when we worship God, we must do it in “spirit and in
truth” because that is they way our heavenly Father wants us to do it.
But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship
the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship
him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit
and in truth. John 4:23-24
If you reject a portion
of the Bible, how can you worship the Father in “spirit and in truth,”
when in reality, all that you’re doing is worshiping in “spirit”
only? Jesus said that if we loved Him, we would keep His commandments
(John 14:15). Jesus sums it beautifully, look at the following verses:
John
14:21-24
25.
He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that
loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I
will love him, and will manifest myself to him.
26.
Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt
manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?
27.
Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my
words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make
our abode with him.
28.
He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which
ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.
May God open your
spiritual eyes,
Charles Thorell
Back to Being
Berean: Various Subjects and The Bible's Answers
Printer-friendly
version |